Naming or Shaming? Presentations of the Self in Specialised Weblog Discourse

Authors

  • Richard Chapman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13136/2281-4582/2017.i10.482

Abstract

During examination of data from a small, specialised corpus, unexpected elements were identified inviting further analysis. Characteristic instances of naming behaviour were observed, prompting deeper investigation into this aspect of web discourse.

A corpus of around 100,000 tokens was assembled over a single day in 2014 by collecting contributions to a weblog discussion of the Israel-Palestine conflict. Research aims were to observe linguistic behaviour over a limited timescale and involving a specific, highly controversial topic. Examination of methodological issues concerned with small corpora and how they should be interrogated was a secondary aim. Data were analysed quantitatively and qualitatively, with a stated intention from the outset to employ a hands-on approach as much as possible.

Various problems emerged, the most suggestive being employment of names and highly pragmatic discourse features in curious ways. A rereading of data concentrating on names, other forms of self-presentation, and attempts to impose identities on others, suggested a need for discourse-level analysis of linguistic behaviour in weblogs, since naming devices often appear as phrases rather than individual words (although they present as a single token with no spaces) and presuppose a textual environment, pragmatic interpretation and a form of dialogue.

References

Alia, Valerie. Names and Nunavut: Culture and Identity in the Inuit Homeland. New York: Berghahn Books, 2009.
Baker, Mona. In Other Words. A Coursebook on Translation. Abingdon: Routledge, 1992.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin: University of Texas Press, 1986.
Blommaert, Jan. The Sociolinguistics of Globalisation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Bruner, Jerome. S. Acts of Meaning. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1990.
Chapman, Richard. “Corpus Linguistic Analysis: How far can we go?” Computer Supported Qualitative Research, 2nd International Symposium on Qualitative Research, ISQR 2017. Eds. A.P. Costa et al. Springer, 2018. 42-47.
Dörnyei, Zoltan. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Dresner, Eli and Susan Herring. “Functions of the Nonverbal in CMC: Emoticons and Illocutionary Force.” Communication Theory 20.3 (2010): 249-268.
Fairclough, Norman. Critical Discourse Analysis. Harlow: Longman, 1995/2010.
Goffman, Erving. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London: Penguin, 1969.
Hagström, Charlotte. “Naming Me, Naming You. Personal Names, Online Signatures and Cultural Meaning.” Names and Identities. Eds. Botolv Helleland, Christian-Emil Ore and Solveig Wikstrøm. Oslo Studies in Language 4.2 (2012). Oslo: University of Oslo. 82-95.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. The Savage Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
McEnery, T., R. Xiao and Y. Tono. Corpus-based Language Studies. Abingdon: Routledge, 2006.
Melville, Herman. Moby Dick or The Whale. New York: Harper, 1851.
Pennycook, Alastair. Language as a Local Practice. Abingdon: Routledge, 2010.
Prodromou, Luke. English as a Lingua Franca. London: Continuum, 2008.
Ricoeur, Paul. The Rule of Metaphor. Abingdon: Routledge, 1978.
Spolsky, Bernard. Sociolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.
Tian, Robert G. and Yan Wu. “Crafting self-identity In a virtual community: Chinese internet users and their political sense form.” Multicultural Education and Technology Journal 1.4 (2007).

Downloads

Published

2017-12-01

Issue

Section

Articles: Special Section