Wort Plant Names in Contemporary English





wort, plant-names, metaphor, metonymy, encyclopedic knowledge


The world of plants has exerted its fascination on researchers in linguistics for a long time. Botanic nomenclature was paramount in investigating categorization (e.g., Berlin, Breedlove, and Raven 1973), and in understanding the relationship between an individual and its environment. In the field of Anglo-Saxon studies, research into the lexicon of plants is of interest for at least two reasons. Firstly, plant names encode a wealth of information on the cultural system that has produced them by mirroring religious beliefs and dietary or medicinal practices. Secondly, this analysis provides insights into the psychological processes and linguistic strategies used to encode nature into language (e.g., Krischke 2013; 2009; Biggam 2003). In contemporary English, the names of ‘wort plants’ follow similar patterns to Old English plant names (Prosyannikova 2020). The lexeme wort is considered archaic by the OED, and it is listed as a suffix by Cambridge Dictionary. It derives from Old English wyrt, meaning plant, root. In contemporary English it is mainly found as the second element of compounds, such as lungwort, mugwort, but also in isolation as an independent morpheme. The present study aims at identifying and analyzing the occurrences of wort and wort-plants in contemporary English. Firstly, I will verify the occurrences of wort-plants in online corpora of English (COCA and BNC) and their frequency of usage. Secondly, I will provide a description of their morphological structure and semantic motivation. Following Blank (1997) and Krischke (2013), I will argue for a metonymic motivation of wort-plant names. Lastly, I will integrate the analysis of corpus data with a lexicographic analysis of their entries in the Oxford English Dictionary, to explore their referents in the two major varieties of English.

Author Biography

Marco Bagli, University of Genoa

Marco Bagli is RtdA at the University of Genoa. He holds a Ph.D. in Cognitive semantics from the University of Perugia. His scientific interests lie in the relationship between language, culture and cognition, in particular in the area of sensory linguistics. His monograph Tastes We Live By is edited by de Gruyter. He authored several articles and book chapters, both at a national and international level. He serves as anonymous reviewer for the journals Cognitive linguistics and Review of Cognitive Lingusitics. 


Al-Snafi, Ali Esmail. “A Review on Lycopus Europaeus: A Potential Medicinal Plant.” IOSR Journal of Pharmacy 9.7 (2019): 80-88.

Allen, David E. and Gabrielle Hatfield. Medicinal Plants in Folk Tradition:. An ethnobotany of Britain and Ireland. London: Timber Press, 2004.

Amilien, Virginie, Hanne Torjusen and Gunnar Vittersø. “From Local Food to Terroir Product? – Some Views About Tjukkmjølk, the Traditional Thick Sour Milk from Røros, Norway.” Anthropology of Food 4 (2005).

Axtell, Annie E., Antonio DiTommaso and Angela R. Post. “Lesser Celandine (Ranunculus ficaria): A Threat to Woodland Habitats in the Northern United States and Southern Canada.” Invasive Plant Science and Management 3.2 (2010): 190-196.

Bauer, Laurie. English Word-Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.

Berlin, Brent, Dennis E. Breedlove and Peter H. Raven. “General Principles of Classification and Nomenclature in Folk Biology.” American Anthropologist 75.1 (1973): 214-242.

Bierbaumer, Peter. Der Botanischer Wortschatz des Altenglischen. Frankfurt am Main: Herbert Lang, 1975.

Bierbaumer, Peter and Helmut W. Klug, edited by. Old Names - New Growth: Proceedings of the 2nd ASPNS Conference, University of Graz, Austria, 6-10 June 2007 and Related Essays. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2009.

Bierbaumer, Peter and Hans Sauer, with Helmut W. Klug and Ulrike Krischke. Dictionary of Old English Plant Names. http://oldenglish-plantnames.org. 2007-2009.

Biersma, Elisabeth M., et al. “Multiple Late-Pleisocene Colonization Events of the Antarctic Pearlwort Colobanthus Quitensis (Caryophyllaceae) Reveal the Recent Arrival of Native Antarctic Vascular Flora.” Journal of Biogeography 47.8 (2020): 1663-1673.

Biggam, Carole P. “Anglo-Saxon Plant-Names - How Can They Be Elucidated?” Contexts of English in Use: Past and Present: A Festschrift for Peter Bierbaumer on the Occasion of the 40th Anniversary of his Career at the University of Graz. Edited by Margit Reitbauer, et al. Vienna: Braumüller, 2007. 27-37.

---, edited by. From Earth to Art: The Many Aspects of the Plant-World in Anglo-Saxon England: Proceedings of the First ASPNS Symposium, University of Glasgow, 5-7 April 2000. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2003.

Bosworth, Joseph. An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary Online. Edited by Thomas Northcote Toller, Christ Sean and Ondřej Tichy. Prague: Faculty of Arts, Charles University, 2014.

Brdar, Mario, Metonymy and Word-Formation: Their Interactions and Complementation. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2017.

Björkman, Erik. “Die Pflanzennamen der althochdeutschen Glossen.” Zeitschrift für Deutsche Wortforschung 2 (1902): 202-233.

Blank, Andreas. Prinzipien des lexikalischen Bedeutungswandels am Beispiel der romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 1997.

---. “Words and Concepts in Time: Towards a Diachronic Cognitive Onomasiology.” Metaphorik 2001.https://www.metaphorik.de/sites/www.metaphorik.de/files/journal-pdf/01_2001_blank.pdf.

Britten, James and Robert Holland. A Dictionary of English Plant-Names. London: Truebner & Co., 1887.

Cienki, John J. and Larry Zaret. “An Internet Misadventure: Bloodroot Salve Toxicity.” Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine 16.10 (2010): 1125-1127.

Cockayne, Thomas Oswald. Leechdoms, Wortcunning and Starcraft of Early England. London: Longman, 1865.

Coles, William. Adam in Eden, or Nature’s Paradise. London: J. Streater for N. Brooke, 1657.

Crow, Garrett E. “A Taxonomic Revision of Sagina (Coryophyllaceae) in North America.” Rhodora 80.821 (1978): 1-91.

Davies, Mark. British National Corpus (from Oxford University Press), 2004. https://www.english-corpora.org/bnc/.

---. The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA), 2008. https://www.english-corpora.org/coca/.

De Koning, Jan, et al. Drawn After Nature. The Complete Botanical Watercolours of the 16th-century Libri Picturati. Zeist: KNNV Publishing, 2008.

Dell’Aica, Isabella, Spiridione Garbisa and Rosy Caniato. “The Renaissance of Hypericum Perforatum: Bio-Medical Research Catches up with Folk Medicine.” Current Bioactive Compounds 3.2 (2007): 109-119.

Dillenberger, Markus S. and Joachim W. Kadereit. “Maximum Polyphyly: Multiple Origins and Delimitation with Plesiomorphic Characters Require a new Circumscription of Minuartia (Caryophyllaceae).” Taxon 63.1 (2014): 64-68.

Dodoens, Rembert. A Nievve Herball, or, Historie of Plantes: Wherein is Contayned the Vvhole Discourse and Perfect Description of all Sortes of Herbes and Plantes: their Diuers and Sundry Kindes … and that not Onely of Those Whiche are here Growyng in This our Countrie of Englande but of all Others also of Forrayne Realmes Commonly used in Physicke. First set Foorth in the Doutche or

Almaigne Tongue. London: Mr. Gerard Dewes, 1578.

Durkin, Philip. The Oxford Guide to Etymology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Ekiert, Halina, et al. “Significance of Artemisia Vulgaris L. (Common Mugwort) in the History of Medicine and Its Possible Contemporary Applications Substantiated by Phytochemical and Pharmacological Studies.” Molecules 25 (2020), 4415.

Frezza, Claudio, et al. “Pedicularis L. Genus: Systematics, Botany, Phytochemistry, Chemotaxonomy, Ethnopharmacology, and Other.” Plants 8.9 (2019): 306.

Geeraerts, Dirk. Theories of Lexical Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010.

Gerard, John. The Herball, or Generall Historie of Plantes. London: E. Bollifant, for B. and I. Norton, 1597.

Günther, Franziska, Thomas Geyer, and Hermann J. Müller. “Salience, Attention and Perception.” Entrenchment and the Psychology of Language Learning: How We Reorganize and Adapt Linguistic Knowledge. Edited by Hans-Jörg Schmid. Washington, DC, and Berlin: APA and Walter de Gruyter, 2017. 289-312.

Govaerts, Rafaël, et al. “The World Checklist of Vascular Plants, a Continuously Updated Resource for Exploring Global Plant

Diversity.” Scientific Data, 8.215 (2021).

Gray, Asa. A Manual of the Botany of the Northern United States, from New England to Wisconsin and South to Ohio and Pennsylvania Inclusive, (the Mosses and Liverworts by Wm. S. Sullivant,) Arranged According to the Natural System. Boston: J. Munroe, 1848.

Hall, Allan R. “Investigating Anglo-Saxon Plant Life and Plant Use: The Archaeobotanical Angle.” From Earth to Art: The Many Aspects of the Plant-World in Anglo-Saxon England: Proceedings of the First ASPNS Symposium, University of Glasgow, 5-7 April 2000. Edited by Carol P. Biggam. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 2003. 101-118.

Haq, Faiz Ul, et al. “Artemisia Annua: Trials are Needed for COVID-19.” Phytotherapy Research 34 (2020): 2423-2424.

Hunt, Tim, edited by. Plant Names of Medieval England. Woodbridge: D. S. Brewer edition, 1989.

Jäkel, Olaf. “Metonymy in Onomastics.” Metonymy in Language and Thought. Edited by Klaus-Uwe Panther and Günther Radden. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1999. 211-229.

Jefferson, Richard G. and Kevin J. Walker. “Biological Flora of the British Isles: Serratula Tinctoria.” Journal of Ecology 105.5 (2017): 1438-1458.

Kastovsky, Dieter. “Semantics and Vocabulary.” The Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. 1: The Beginnings to 1066. Edited by Richard Hogg. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. 290-408.

Koslicki, Kathrin. “Natural Kinds and Natural Kind Terms.” Philosophy Compass 3/4 (2008): 789-802.

Kövecses, Zoltán. “Visual Metaphor in Extended Conceptual Metaphor Theory.” Cognitive Linguistics studies 7.1 (2020): 13-30.

Krischke, Ulrike. “On the Semantics of the Old English Compound Plant Names: Motivations and Associations.” Old Names – New Growth: Proceedings of the 2nd Symposium of the ASPNS (Anglo-Saxon Plant-Name Survey), 6th-10th June 2007, University of Graz, Austria, and Related Essays. Edited by Peter Bierbaumer and Helmut W. Klug. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2009. 211-278.

Krischke, Ulrike. The Old English Complex Plant Names: A Linguistic Survey and a Catalogue. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang, 2013.

Lakoff, George. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.

Lindsay, William Lauder. A Popular History of British Lichens: Comprising an Account of Their Structure, Reproduction, Uses, Distribution, And Classification. London: Lovell Reeve, 1856.

Lehrer, Adrienne. “A Theory of Vocabulary Structure: Retrospectives and Prospectives.” Thirty Years of Linguistics Evolution. Edited by Martin Pütz. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1992a. 243-256.

---. “Names and Naming: Why We Need Fields and Frames.” Frames, Fields and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization. Edited by Eva Kittay and Adrienne Lehrer. New York: Routledge, 1992b. 123-142.

Lyons, John. Semantics: 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977.

Niering, William A. and Nancy C. Olmstead. National Audobon Society Field Guide to North American Wildflowers (Eastern Region). New York: Knopf, 1979.

Pavord, Anna. The Naming of Names: The Search for Order in the World of Plants. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2005.

Pearce, J. M. S. “The Doctrine of Signatures.” European Neurology 60 (2008): 51-52.

Peterson, Roger Tory and Margaret McKenny. A Field Guide to Wildflowers of Northeastern and North-Central North America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1968.

Porcellato, Davide, Malena Tranvåg and Judith Narvhus. “Short Communication: Presence of Lactococcus and Lactococcal Exopolysaccharide Operons on the Leaves of Pinguicula Vulgaris Supports the Traditional Source of Bacteria Present in Scandinavian Ropy Fermented Milk.” Journal of Dairy Science 99.9 (2016): 7049-7052.

Prosyannikova, Olga I. “Old English Plant Names With Component -wyrt and Their Modern Names: Structural and Semantic Aspect.” Liberal Arts in Russia 9.4 (2020): 246-255.

Radden, Günther and Zoltàn Kövecses. “Towards a Theory of Metonymy.” Metonymy in Language and Thought. Edited by Klaus-

Uwe Panther and Günther Radden. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1999. 17-59.

Schmid, Hans-Jörg and Franziska Günther. “Toward a Unified Socio-Cognitive Framework for Salience in Language.” Frontiers in Psychology 7 (2016): 1110.

Schmid, Hans- Jörg. The Dynamics of the Linguistic System: Usage, Conventionalization and Entrenchment. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.

Sweetser, Eve. “’The Suburbs of Your Good Pleasure’: Cognition, Culture and the Bases of Metaphoric Structure.” The Shakespearean International Yearbook, vol. 4: Shakespeare Studies Today. Edited by Graham Bradshaw, Tom Bishop and Mark

Turner. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing, 2004. 24-55.

Tennant, Pamela. Village Notes and Some Other Papers. London: William Heinemann, 1900.

Ungerer, Friedrich and Hans-Jörg Schmid. Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. Harlow: Longman, 2006.






Articles (general section) - English language and linguistics