Job or Jonah? Re-elaborating and Overcoming Biblical Paradigms in Philip Roth’s “Nemesis”

Authors

  • Anastasia Piccioni

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13136/2281-4582/2023.i22.1393

Keywords:

Philip Roth, Jewish Biblical tradition, Biblical paradigms, Nemesis, poliomyelitis

Abstract

As commentators like Coetzee, Batnitzky and Stangherlin have already stated, Philip Roth’s 2010 novella Nemesis can be read as a complex reconfiguration of some tropes belonging to Greek mythology juxtaposed to a rewriting of the Jewish Biblical tradition: embracing features from Oedipus, Prometheus, and Job, Eugene “Bucky” Cantor is the result of Roth’s “audaciousness of combining the characteristics of a fundamentally Judeo-Christian figure with that of the Greek tragic hero withing a single character” (Stangherlin 2016, 75). However, as regards his pervasive and conflicted relationship with God, I believe an examination of Bucky Cantor through the lenses of the Jewish Biblical tradition may shed new light on Roth’s peculiar characterization of the novella’s protagonist. Building on contributions by the abovementioned authors, I argue that Bucky Cantor can be investigated as the point of intersection between two different Biblical models, Job and Jonah, and that his character overcomes the archetypical status of each of his paradigms. Although Bucky is immediately associated with the Joban themes because of his extreme position as regards theodicy, his sudden abandonment of the playground students—considered by Bucky as his responsibility and mission at the beginning of the narration—reminds the reader of Jonah’s rejection of God’s will. Ultimately, Bucky’s ‘whale’ consists of his role in the spread of the polio epidemic, which is also the pinnacle of his religious crisis: “God gave me polio that I in turn gave to at least a dozen kids, probably more” (Roth 2010, 263).

Author Biography

Anastasia Piccioni

Anastasia Piccioni is a former student of English and Angloamerican Studies (MA) at Sapienza University of Rome, recently gradutated with a thesis focused on a thematic and comparative analysis of T. Kushner's Angels in America: A Gay Fantasia on National Themes and P. Roth's Nemesis. She has recently co-curated the issue "The Art of Remembering" (May 2023) for the online student-based journal Transitions - A Postgraduate Journal. Currently, her main reasearch interests include Jewish American literature, postmodernist fiction and gender studies.

References

Aarons, Victoria. “Expelled Once Again: The Failure of the Fantasized Self in Philip Roth’s Nemesis.” Philip Roth Studies 9.1 (2013): 51-63.

Band, Arnold J. “Swallowing Jonah: The Eclipse of Parody.” Prooftexts 10.2 (1990): 177-195.

Batnitzky, Leora. “Beyond Theodicy?: Joban Themes in Philip Roth’s Nemesis.” The Book of Job: Aesthetics, Ethics, Hermeneutics. Edited by Leora Batnitzky and Ilana Pardes. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2015. 213-224.

Berlin, Adele and Marc Avi Brettler. The Jewish Study Bible. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.

Coetzee, J. M. “On The Moral Brink.” Rev. of Nemesis, by Philip Roth. The New York Review of Books 28 October 2010. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2010/10/28/moral-brink/. Last visited 30/05/2023.

Duban, James. “How to Forgive, and Whom: Roth’s Nemesis and Moby-Dick.” Philip Roth Studies 9.2 (2013): 71-76.

Fox, Michael V. “The Meanings of the Book of Job.” Journal of Biblical Literature 137.1 (2018): 7-18.

Frye, Northrop. The Great Code: The Bible and Literature. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Publishers, 1982.

Giannopoulou, Zina. “Oedipus Meets Bucky in Philip Roth’s Nemesis.” Philip Roth Studies 12.1 (2016): 15-31.

Kaminsky, Inbar. “Epidemic Judaism: Plagues and Their Evocation in Philip Roth’s Nemesis and Ben Marcus’s The Flame Alphabet.” Philip Roth Studies 10.1 (2014): 109-124.

Knox, Melissa. “‘I’m Done’: Philip Roth, Serio Ludere, Narcissism, and Nemesis.” Readings: A Journal for Scholars and Readers 1.1 (2015): 1-12.

Lewis, C. S. Reflections on the Psalms. London: Geoffrey Bles, 1958.

Miles, John A. “Laughing at the Bible: Jonah as Parody.” The Jewish Quarterly Review 65.3 (1975): 168-181.

Pelli, Moshe. “The Literary Art of Jonah.” Hebrew Studies 20/21 (1979): 18-28.

Roth, Philip. American Pastoral. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1997.

---. Nemesis. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2010.

Simonetti, Paolo. “Notizie sui testi (Nemesis).” I Meridiani Mondadori 3 (2019): 1791.

Stangherlin, Nicholas. “Nemesis and the Persistence of Tragic Framing: Bucky Cantor as Job, Hebrew Prometheus, and Reverse Oedipus.” Philip Roth Studies 12.1 (2016): 73-87.

Steinmann, Andrew E. “The Structure and Message of the Book of Job.” Vetus Testamentum 46.1 (1996): 85-100.

Sundquist, Eric J. “Philip Roth’s Holocaust.” The Hopkins Review 5.2 (2012): 226-256.

Tsevat, Matitiahu. “The Meaning of The Book of Job.” Hebrew Union College Annual 37 (1966): 73-106.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-21