From Protest to Criminal Disruption
A Diachronic Investigation into the Framing of Climate Activism in the UK
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13136/2281-4582/2025.i26.1666Keywords:
Corpus-assisted discourse analysis, English language, News discourse, Climate activismAbstract
This study investigates how climate activism has been represented in two major British newspapers, The Guardian (2015-2023) and The Telegraph (2020-2023). Drawing on a purpose-built corpus of over 1.4 million words and employing a corpus-based discourse analytic approach, the research explores diachronic shifts and cross-newspaper differences in the portrayal of activist groups Extinction Rebellion and Just Stop Oil. The analysis focuses on the linguistic framing of activists in building the narratives surrounding climate action. Results reveal that The Guardian’s discourse has evolved from event-based reporting towards a more activist-centred and solidarity-driven narrative, increasingly linking climate activism to social justice issues and broadening its evaluative framing to include both supportive and more critical views. The Telegraph, instead, primarily frames activism in terms of disruption, legality, and public order concerns, without much emphasis on the activists’ social or ideological motivations. Word Sketch analyses of the terms activist(s) and protester(s) further confirm the different evaluative patterns and orientations of the two publications. The trends observed point to the need for further critical investigation of the framing of activists in the media and of its role in polarising public opinion, influencing the debate on policies and defining the role of protest in democratic societies.
References
Amenta, Edwin, et al. “From Bias to Coverage: What Explains How News Organizations Treat Social Movements.” Sociology Compass 11.3 (2017): e12460.
Amenta, Edwin, et al. “Making Good News: What Explains the Quality of Coverage of the Civil Rights Movement.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 24.1 (2019): 19-37.
Caren, Neal, Kenneth T. Andrews and Todd Lu. “Contemporary Social Movements in a Hybrid Media Environment.” Annual Review of Sociology 46.1 (2020): 443-465.
Chinn, Sedona, P. Sol Hart and Stuart Soroka. “Politicization and Polarization in Climate Change News Content, 1985-2017.” Science Communication 42.1 (2020): 112-129.
Corrigall‐Brown, Catherine. “What Gets Covered? An Examination of Media Coverage of the Environmental Movement in Canada.” Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie 53.1 (2016): 72-93.
de Moor, Joost, et al. “Protest for a Future II: Composition, Mobilization and Motives of the Participants in Fridays For Future Climate Protests on 20-27 September, 2019, in 19 Cities around the World.” 2020. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2%3A1397070/FULLTEXT01.pdf. Last visited 20/11/2025.
Entman, Robert Mathew. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43 (1993): 51-58.
Feinberg, Matthew, Robb Willer and Chloe Kovacheff. “The Activist’s Dilemma: Extreme Protest Actions Reduce Popular Support for Social Movements.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 119.5 (2020): 1086-1111.
Filmer, Denise and Gianmarco Vignozzi. “Constructing Extremism: A Comparative Analysis of News Discourse in ‘The Guardian’ and ‘The Telegraph.’” Textus 1 (2025): 79-101.
Fisher, Dana R. and Sohana Nasrin. “Climate Activism and its Effects.” Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 12.1 (2020): e683.
---. “Shifting Coalitions Within the Youth Climate Movement in the US.” Politics and Governance 9.2 (2021): 112-123.
Fisher, Dana R., Oscar Berglund and Colin J. Davis. “How Effective are Climate Protests at Swaying Policy – and What Could Make a Difference?” Nature 623.7989 (2023): 910-913.
Hase, Valerie, et al. “Climate Change in News Media Across the Globe: An Automated Analysis of Issue Attention and Themes in Climate Change Coverage in 10 Countries (2006-2018).” Global Environmental Change 70 (2021): 102353.
Hutter, Swen and Rens Vliegenthart. “Who Responds to Protest? Protest Politics and Party Responsiveness in Western Europe.” Party Politics 24.4 (2018): 358-369.
Kenward, Ben and Cameron Brick. “Large-scale Disruptive Activism Strengthened Environmental Attitudes in the United Kingdom.” Global Environmental Psychology 2 (2024): 1-35.
Kilgarriff, Adam, et al. “The Sketch Engine: Ten Years On.” Lexicography 1 (2014): 7-36.
McCarthy, John D., Clark McPhail and Jackie Smith. “Images of Protest: Dimensions of Selection Bias in Media Coverage of Washington Demonstrations, 1982 and 1991.” American Sociological Review (1996): 478-499.
Molder, Amanda L., et al. “Framing the Global Youth Climate Movement: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Greta Thunberg’s Moral, Hopeful, and Motivational Framing on Instagram.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 27.3 (2022): 668-695.
Mutz, Diana C. and Joe Soss. “Reading Public Opinion: The Influence of News Coverage on Perceptions of Public Sentiment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 61.3 (1997): 431-451.
Painter, James and Neil T. Gavin. “Climate Skepticism in British Newspapers, 2007-2011.” Environmental Communication 10.4 (2016): 432-452.
Scheuch, Eric G., et al. “The Power of Protest in the Media: Examining Portrayals of Climate Activism in UK News.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11.1 (2024): 1-12.
Simpson, Brent, Robb Willer and Matthew Feinberg. “Radical Flanks of Social Movements Can Increase Support for Moderate Factions.” PNAS Nexus 1.3 (2022): pgac110.
Smith, Jackie, et al. “From Protest to Agenda Building: Description Bias in Media Coverage of Protest Events in Washington, DC.” Social Forces 79.4 (2001): 1397-1423.
Stecula, Dominik A. and Eric Merkley. “Framing Climate Change: Economics, Ideology, and Uncertainty in American News Media Content from 1988 to 2014.” Frontiers in Communication 4 (2019): 6.
Van Leeuwen, Theo. “Representing Social Action.” Discourse & Society 6.1 (1995): 81-106.
Vu, Hong Tien, et al. “Social Media and Environmental Activism: Framing Climate Change on Facebook by Global NGOs.” Science Communication 43.1 (2021): 91-115.
Wouters, Ruud and Stefaan Walgrave. “Demonstrating Power: How Protest Persuades Political Representatives.” American Sociological Review 82.2 (2017): 361-383.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Gloria Cappelli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Iperstoria is an Open Access journal.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 BY License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of their work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. We kindly ask authors to inform us of any instances of re-publication.
