The Crisis of the Social Realist Novel in the United States: The "Tragic" Case of Jonathan Franzen's Strong Motion
Keywords:Jonathan Franzen, Socialist Realist Novel
AbstractJonathan Franzen’s production is characterized by a body of non-fiction writing that has greatly contributed to the heated debate about the declining relevance of the novel in contemporary America. In his controversial essay “Perchance to Dream: In the Age of Images, a Reason to Write Novels,” published in 1996, Franzen acknowledged the diminished cultural role of highbrow novels in a nation dominated by consumerism, mass culture, new media and instant entertainment. In this light, the author made a public call for ambitious fiction to rise to the challenges of the late twentieth century. Interestingly, Franzen equated such novels with the “tragic” mode: by “tragic” he meant “just about any fiction that raises more questions than it answers: anything in which conflict doesn’t resolve into cant.” Much of Franzen’s fiction participates in the same discourse that is developed in his essayistic production, especially his early work, which is infused with large-scale social and cultural critique. His second novel in particular, Strong Motion, having been completed in the early 1990s, at the height of his frustration with the coeval American novel, appears of particular interest. Strong Motion exposes what Franzen aptly calls “the dirt” behind the American “dream of Chosenness.” The novel decries the failure of a nation that, far from being a shining “City upon a Hill,” has fallen prey to an unstoppable process of cultural and moral entropy that coincided with the inception of a “predatory” capitalistic system of power, which has influenced gender and social roles, the notion of progress, and the general attitude to the natural world, with the environment in particular being brutally degraded to mere infrastructure. In so doing, the book stands as an example of the author’s “tragic” mode.
Birkerts, Sven. The Gutenberg Elegies: The Fate of Reading in an Electronic Age. Boston: Faber and Faber,
Buell, Lawrence. Writing for an Endangered World: Literature, Culture, and the Environment in the U.S. and
Beyond. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2001.
Dix, Andrew, Brian Jarvis, and Paul Jenner. The Contemporary American Novel in Context. New York:
Eagelton, Terry. Ideology: An Introduction. London and New York: Verso, 1991.
Eder, Richard. “Shaky Town East.” Review of Strong Motion. Los Angeles Times Books Review 4
September 1988: 3, 7.
Eisenstein, Zillah. “Constructing a Theory of Capitalist Patriarchy and Socialist Feminism.” Critical Sociology
7.3 (1977): 3-17.
Franzen, Jonathan. “Perchance to Dream: In the Age of Images, a Reason to Write Novels.” Harper’s
Magazine April 1996: 35-55.
---. Strong Motion. New York: Norton, 1992.
---. The Discomfort Zone: A Personal History. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2006.
---. “Why Bother?” How to Be Alone. London: Fourth Estate, 2002. 55-97.
Gorecki, Julie. “How Did This Happen? Capitalism’s Double Subordination of Women and Nature.” The
Feminist Wire (May 2015). www.thefeministwire.com/2015/05/how-did-this-happen-capitalismsdouble-subordination-of-women-and-nature. Last visited May 23, 2019.
Green, Jeremy. Late Postmodernism: American Fiction at the Millennium. New York: Palgrave MacMillan,
Harrison, Peter. “‘Fill the Earth and Subdue it’: Biblical Warrants for Colonization in Seventeenth Century.”
Journal of Religious History 29 (2005): 3-24.
Hermanson, Scott. The Simulation of Nature: Contemporary American Fiction in an Environmental Context.
Cincinnati: The University of Cincinnati Press, 2001.
Kernan, Alvin. The Death of Literature. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992.
Kolodny, Annette. The Lay of the Land: Metaphor as Experience and History in American Life and Letters.
Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1975.
Locke, John. “Of Property.” Philosophy of Law: Classic and Contemporary Readings. Eds. Larry May and
Jeff Brown. Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell, 2010. 251-257
Mies, Maria. Patriarchy and Capital Accumulation on a World Scale: Women in the International Division of
Labour. London and New York: Zed Books, 1998.
Orr, John. Tragic Realism and Modern Society: Studies in the Sociology of the Modern Novel. Basingstoke,
UK: Palgrave Macmillan, 1978.
Rossinow, Doug. The Reagan Era: A History of the 1980s. New York: Columbia University Press, 2015.
Roth, Philip. “Writing American Fiction.” Commentary 31 (1963): 222-233.
“Strong Motion.” Earthquake Glossary. www.earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/glossary/?term=strong%20motion.
Las visited December 2, 2018.
Trilling, Lionel. “Art and Fortune.” The Liberal Imagination. New York: The New York Review of Books, 2008.
Walker Berström, Catharine. “Recognizing the Ache of the Other: Jonathan Franzen’s Reasons for
Bothering.” Ethics and Poetics: Ethical Recognitions and Social Reconfigurations in Modern
Narratives. Eds. Margrét Gunnarsdóttir Champion and Irina Rasmussen Goloubeva. Newcastle upon
Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2014. 107-134.
Weich, Dave. “Jonathan Franzen Uncorrected.” Interview with Jonathan Franzen. Powell’s 15 May 2004.
www.powells.com/authors/franzen. Last visited October 10, 2018.
Weinstein, Philip. Jonathan Franzen: The Comedy of Rage. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2015.
Westling, Louise. “Literature, the Environment, and the Question of the Posthuman.” Nature in Literary and
Cultural Studies: Transatlantic Conversations on Ecocriticism. Ed. Catrin Gersdorf. Amsterdam:
Rodopi, 2006. 25-47.
Wolfe, Tom. “Stalking the Billion-Footed Beast: A Literary Manifesto for the New Social Novel.” Harper’s
Magazine (Nov. 1989): 45-59.
---. The New Journalism. With an Anthology Edited by Tom Wolfe and E. W. Johnson. New York: Harper and
Yardley, Jonathan. “Whole Lot of Shakin’.” Rev. of Strong Motion. Washington Post BookWorld 12 January
LicenseIperstoria is an Open Access journal.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 BY-NC License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of their work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. We require authors to inform us of any instances of re-publication.