Online ESP Learning through H5P© Project Activities
A Digital Opportunity for Organic Enterprises
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13136/2281-4582/2023.i21.1316Keywords:
English for Specific Purposes, University Language Centers, autonomous self-study, motivation, H5P©Abstract
Within an increasing use of ITCs in modern language learning and teaching, technology has proven to be particularly appropriate for English for Specific Purposes courses and adult learners. If the Council of Europe emphasized the importance of learners as social agents, the use of ITCs in language learning puts them at the centre of the learning process, allowing the users not only to consume digital contents, but also to produce an output of it: as “prosumers,” digital learners self-determine their autonomy and embrace a new learning environment, where content is shared and knowledge is co-constructed.
This article will present a project launched in 2020 by the University of Calabria, where the synergy between the University Language Centre and the H5P© software has created an open-access language-learning opportunity that encourages learners’ autonomy, fostering their motivation and promoting the scaffolding of new knowledge and skills useful for employability.
References
“About the Project.” h5p.org. www.h5p.org/about-the-project. Last visited 20/10/2022.
Argondizzo, Carmen and Jean Jimenez. “Promoting Plurilingualism and Intercultural Communication in European Enterprises and Academic Contexts: a European Winner Project.” Linguistic Insights 204 (2015): 165-188.
Argondizzo, Carmen and Alessandra Ficarra. “Smart Languages for Smart Enterprises: Encouraging a Positive Language-Learning Attitude among Calabrian Micro-Enterprises.” Centri Linguistici di Ateneo: strategie d’intervento nei processi di comunicazione interlinguistica e interculturale. Edited by Michele Bevilacqua, Rosario Pellegrino e Valeria Anna Vaccaro. Naples: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, 2021. 105-137.
Arnold, Ewen. “Authenticity Revisited: How Real is Real?” English for Specific Purposes 10.3 (1991): 237-244.
Arnó-Macià, Elisabeth, “The Role of Technology in Teaching Languages for Specific Purposes Courses.” The Modern Language Journal 96 (2012): 89-104.
Bandura, Albert. “Self-efficacy.” Encyclopaedia of Human Behaviour 4. Edited by V. S. Ramachaudran. New York: Academic Press, 1994. 71-81.
Barton, David and Carmen Lee. Language Online: Investigating Digital Texts and Practices. London: Routledge, 2013.
Belcher, Diane D. “English for Specific Purposes: Teaching to Perceived Needs and Imagined Futures in Worlds of Work, Study, and Everyday Life.” TESOL Quarterly 40.1 (2006): 133-156.
Benson, Phil. Teaching and Researching Autonomy in Language Learning. Harlow: Pearson Education, 2001.
Bhutada, Govind. “Visualizing the Most Used Languages on the Internet.” Visual Capitalist 26 March 2021. www.visualcapitalist.com/the-most-used-languages-on-the-internet. Last visited 20/09/2022.
Bliss, Joan, Mike Askew and Sheila Macrae. “Effective Teaching and Learning: Scaffolding Revisited.” Oxford Review of Education 22.1 (1996): 37-61.
Breen, Michael P. “Authenticity in the Language Classroom.” Applied Linguistics 6.1 (1985): 60-70.
Bündgens-Kosten, Judith and Peter Schildhauer. “Englischunterricht in einer digitalisierten Gesellschaft: The Times They Are a-Changin’ oder there is Nothing New under the Sun?” Englischunterricht in einer digitalisierten Gesellschaft. Edited by Judith Bündgens-Kosten and Peter Schildhauer. Beltz, 2020. 4-19.
Candlin, Christopher N. “Towards Task-Based Language Learning.” Language Learning Tasks. Edited by Christopher N. Candlin, and Dermot Murphy. London: Prentice-Hall International (UK) Ltd and Lancaster University, 1987. 23-46.
CMC_E Project. www.cmceproject.it. Last visited 20/09/2022.
Cook, Luella B. “Business English or English in Business?” The English Journal 9.2 (1920): 80-87.
Cordina, David, Jérôme Rambert and Marc Oddou. Pratiques et projets numériques en classe de FLE. Paris: CLE International, 2017.
Council of Europe. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Coyle, Do, Philip Hood and David Marsh. CLIL – Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Deci, Edward L., Richard Koestner and Richard Ryan. M. “Extrinsic Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation in Education: Reconsidered Once Again.” Review of Educational Research 71.1 (2001): 1-27.
Dudley-Evans, Tony. Developments in English for Specific Purposes: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Ellis, Rod, et al. Task-Based Language: Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.
Erben, Tony, et al. “Using Technology for Foreign Language Instruction: Creative Innovations, Research, and Applications.” Calling All Foreign Language Teachers. Edited by Tony Erben and Iona Sarieva. New York: Routledge, 2013. 13-33.
European Commission. Languages Mean Business: Companies Work better with Languages. Recommendations from the Business Forum for Multilingualism established by the European Commission, 2008.
Gilmore, Alexander. “Authentic Materials and Authenticity in Foreign Language Learning.” Language Teaching 40.2 (2007): 97-118.
Giurgiu, Luminiţa and Ghiţă Bârsan. “The Prosumer – Core and Consequence of the Web 2.0 Era.” Journal of Social Informatics 9 (2008): 53-59.
Graddol, David. The Future of English. London: British Council, 2000.
Harris, Sandra and Francesca Bargiela-Chiappini. “Business as a Site of Language Contact.” Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 23 (2003): 155-169.
Hirsch, Nele, et al. “H5P im Unterricht – Erfahrungen und Ideen.” Edulabs.de 24 October 2017. www.edulabs.de/blog/H5P-im-Unterricht-Erfahrungen-Ideen. Last visited 20/10/2022.
Holec, Henri. Autonomy in Foreign Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon, 1981.
Hutchinson, Tom and Alan Waters. English for Specific Purposes: A Learning-Centered Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
Karlsson, Leena, Felicity Kjisik and Joan Nordlund. “Language Counselling: A Critical and Integral Component in Promoting an Autonomous Community of Learning.” System 35.1 (2007): 46-65.
Knowles, Malcolm. Self-Directed Learning: A Guide for Learners and Teachers. New York: Association Press, 1975.
Krashen, Stephen D. Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Oxford: Pergamon, 1981.
Lehtonen, Tuula and Sinikka Karjalainen. “Workplace Language Needs and University Language Education – Do They Meet?” European Journal of Education 44.3 (2009): 411-420.
Little, David. Learner Autonomy 1: Definitions, Issues and Problems. Dublin: Au¬thentik, 1991.
Master, Peter. “ESP Teacher Education in the USA.” Teacher Education for Languages for Specific Purposes. Edited by R. Howard and G. Brown. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, 1997. 22-40.
Mills, Kathy Ann. The Multiliteracies Classroom. Bristol: Multilingual Matters, 2010.
Mishra, Punya and Matthew J. Koehler. “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge.” Teachers College Record 108.6 (2006): 1017-1054.
MOOCs UNICAL Project. www.moocs.unical.it/. Last visited 20/09/2022.
Nunan, David. Learner-Centered English Language Education. New York: Routledge, 2013.
---. The Learner-Centred Curriculum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
Nickerson, Catherine. “Editorial – English as a lingua franca in international business contexts.” English for Specific Purposes 24 (2005): 367-380.
Nomass, Bassma Basheer. “The Impact of Using Technology in Teaching English as a Second Language.” English Language and Literature Studies 3.1 (2013): 111-116.
Parks, Susan, et al. “Crossing Boundaries: Multimedia Technology and Pedagogical Innovation in a High School Class.” Language Learning and Technology 7.1 (2003): 28-45.
Pelet, Jean-Eric. “E-Learning 2.0 Technologies and Web Applications in Higher Education.” Hershey: Information Science Reference, 2014.
Pinner, Richard S. “Examining Authenticity and Motivation from an International Perspective.” JACET ESP Annual Report 14 (2012): 26-35.
Prabhu, N.S. Second Language Pedagogy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987.
Rubin, Joan. “What ‘the Good Language Learner’ Can Teach Us.” Sociolinguistic Aspects of Language Learning and Teaching. Edited by J.B. Pride. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1975. 17-26.
Sifakis, Nicos C. “Applying the Adult Education Framework to ESP Curriculum Development: An Integrative Model.” Science Direct, English for Specific Purposes 22.2 (2003): 195-211.
Skehan, Peter. “A Framework for the Implementation of Task-Based Learning.” IATEFL 1993 Annual Conference Report (1993): 17-25.
Smagorinsky, Peter. “Deconflating the ZPD and Instructional Scaffolding: Retranslating and Reconceiving the Zone of Proximal Development as the Zone of Next Development.” Learning, Culture and Social Interaction 16 (2018): 70-75.
Toffler, Alvin. The Third Wave. Milan: Sperling and Kupfer, 1987.
Vaccaro, Valeria A. “Vantaggi della didattica a distanza nell’apprendimento di adulti.” Centri linguistici di ateneo: strategie d’intervento nei processi di comunicazione interlinguistica e interculturale. Edited by Michele Bevilacqua, Rosario Pellegrino and Valeria Anna Vaccaro. Naples: Edizioni Scientifiche Italiane, 2021. 297-310.
Warschauer, Mark. A Developmental Perspective on Technology in Language Education. TESOL Quarterly 36 (2002): 453-475.
Wilson, Gabriel V. “The Effects of External Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation.” www.abcbodybuilding.com 2006. https://nanopdf.com/download/the-effects-of-external-rewards-on-intrinsic-motivation_pdf. Last visited 20/10/2022.
Wood, David, Jerome S. Bruner and Gail Ross. “The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving.” Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 17.2 (1976): 89-100.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Alessandra Ficarra
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Iperstoria is an Open Access journal.- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 BY-NC License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of their work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. We require authors to inform us of any instances of re-publication.