La storia al tempo della politica. Le produzione teatrali di Tutto è vero (Enrico VIII) nel Novecento
The paper explores the main features of Shakespeare and Fletcher’s All is True, or Henry VIII (1613) through its twentieth-century productions. The play was included in the famous 1623 Folio among the histories (Fletcher’s co-authorship had not been acknowledged yet and it is still debated today) by the editors who probably dismissed the original or alternative title, All is True, and adopted The Famous History of the Life of King Henry VIII so as to strengthen the contiguities between this late work, revolving around one of the most controversial figure of Tudor dynasty, and the previous histories. Nonetheless, the original title and its insistence on “truth” is constantly alluded throughout the play, whose main theme is the use of propaganda, rumors, slanders and defamation as means of political action. This is probably one of the reasons why in the 20th century a few directors chose this play to reflect on the dynamics of modern politics and on the rhetoric of politics in the age of information. Their productions may be split into two main scenic readings: a conservative one, faithful to the Shakespearean tradition established by the Victorians and focused on the ceremonialist and nationalist aspects of the play; and a more radical one, which underlines the hypocrisy of modern politics and the emptiness of its propagandistic practices. The paper reconstructs the pivotal moments of the two performative lines, and analyses the main features and the historical contexts of the productions from Gray’s direction of the play (1931) until Doran’s 1996 e 1998 productions, which significantly restored the title All is True.
Brietz Monta, Susan. “‘Thous fall’st a blessed martyr’: Shakespeare’s Henry VIII and the Polemics of Conscience.” English Literary Renaissance 30 (2000): 262-283.
Cave, Richard Allen. Terence Gray and the Cambridge Festival Theatre. Cambridge: Chadwych-Healy, 1980.
Collick, John. Shakespeare, Cinema and Society. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1989.
Kamps, Ivo. “Possible Pasts: Historiography and Legitimation in Henry VIII.” College English 58.2 (1996): 192-215.
Marshall, Norman. The Other Theatre. London: J. Lehmann, 1947.
McMullan, Gordon. “Introduction.” King Henry VIII: The Arden Shakespeare, Third Series. London: A&C Black Publishers, 2000.
---. The Shakespeare Effect: A History of Twentieth-Century Performance. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.
O’ Connor, John, and Katharine Goodland. A Directory of Shakespeare in Performance 1970-2005. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
Richmond, Hugh M. Henry VIII: Shakespeare in Performance Series. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1994.
Rudnytsky, Peter L. “Henry VIII and the Deconstruction of History.” Shakespeare Survey 43 (1991): 43-58.
Sahel, Pierre. “The Strangeness of a Dramatic Style: Rumour in Henry VIII.” Shakespeare Survey 38 (1985): 145-152.
Shakespeare, William. The Complete Works. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Shaughnessy, Robert. “All Is True? The Davies-Edgar Henry VIII (1983).” Representing Shakespeare: England, History and RSC. London and New York: Routledge, 1994. 149-162.
Slights, Camille W. “The Politics of Conscience in All Is True (or Henry VIII).” Shakespeare Survey, 43 (1991): 59-68.
Spedding, James. “Who Wrote Shakespeare’s Henry VIII?” The Gentleman’s Magazine 34 (1850): 24-115.
Vickers, Brian. Shakespeare, Co-Author. London: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Wegemer, Gerard B. “Henry VIII on Trial: Confronting Malice and Conscience in Shakespeare’s All Is True.” Renascence: Essays on Values in Literature 52.2 (2000): 111-130.
Worden, Blair. “Shakespeare and Politics.” Shakespeare Survey 44 (1992): 1-16.
Young, Alan R. “Shakespeare’s Henry VIII and the Theme of Conscience.” English Studies in Canada 7.1 (1981): 38-53.
Copyright (c) 2016 Carmen Gallo
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.Iperstoria is an Open Access journal.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 BY-NC License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of their work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. We require authors to inform us of any instances of re-publication.