Constructing National Identity in Men vs Women’s Magazines: A Case Study from the USA

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.13136/2281-4582/2021.i17.1001

Keywords:

Corpus-assisted Discourse Analysis, Gender, Magazines, National Identity, United States of America

Abstract

National identity plays an important role in defining many people’s attitude towards reality. Its representation has remained under the radar within the field of linguistics for decades, while being investigated in a number of different genres, from political speeches to advertisement; in this regard, however, a gap can be found when it comes to magazines.
This study focuses on US national context and seeks to reveal how a range of discursive devices—including lexical, syntactic and metaphorical patterns—are used in the representation of nation and national identity in popular magazines published in the US. The analysis provides a comparison based on the target audience’s gender identity.
A mixed methods approach is applied to two corpora, covering a time span between 2015 and 2020 and comprising a total of approximately 9 million words from popular magazines aimed respectively at a female (Allure, Cosmopolitan, Marie Claire, Vanity Fair and Vogue) and male audience (Men’s Health, Popular Mechanics, Esquire and GQ). Firstly, we employed corpus-assisted methods to explore the data at a more general level, drawing on concordance and collocation analysis. Secondly, we carried out in-depth, qualitative analysis of relevant words and expressions looking at their wider textual context. Thirdly, we compared the results between corpora. The analysis shows some common patterns—e.g., a strong use of personification of the country, often represented as facing a moment of crisis—as well as differences in how these patterns are articulated in the two corpora.

Author Biographies

  • Angela Zottola, Università degli Studi di Torino

    Angela Zottola is a Researcher in English Language and Linguistics at the University of Torino. Her research interests include (Critical) Discourse Analysis, Corpus Linguistics, Queer Linguistics and Ecolinguistics applied to the analysis of the media. She is interested in investigating the representation of identities in different contexts. Among her recent publications is her book Transgeder Identities in the Press (2021), published by Bloomsbury.

  • Virginia Zorzi, Università degli Studi di Torino

    Virginia Zorzi is an adjunct instructor of English Language and Linguistics at the University of Torino. Her research is situated within the fields of applied linguistics, discourse analysis and sociology, and her work chiefly draws on methods related to corpus linguistics. Her recent works have focused on the public communication of science and technology, populism and political communication in social media and, recently, the representation of national identity.

References

Anderson, Benedict. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. New York: Verso, 1983.

Ariely, Gal. “Globalisation and the Decline of National Identity? An Exploration across Sixty‐three Countries.” Nations and Nationalism 18.3 (2012): 461-482.

Baker, Paul. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum, 2006.

Baker, Paul, Costa Gabrielatos and Tony McEnery. “Sketching Muslims: A Corpus Driven Analysis of Representations Around the Word ‘Muslim’ in the British Press 1998–2009.” Applied Linguistics 34.3 (2013): 255–278.

Balirano, Giuseppe. Masculinity and Representation: A Multimodal Critical Approach to Male Identity Constructions. Napoli: Loffredo, 2014.

Billig, Michael. Banal Nationalism. London: Sage, 1995.

Bogain, Ariane. “Terrorism and the Discursive Construction of National Identity in France.” National Identities 21.3 (2019): 241-265.

Bourdieu, Pierre. “Rethinking the State: Genesis and Structure of the Bureaucratic Field.” Sociological Theory 12.1 (1994): 1–18.

Brenan, Megan. “American Pride Hits New Low; Few Proud of Political System.” Gallup 2 July 2019. https://news.gallup.com/poll/259841/american-pride-hits-new-low-few-proud-political-system.aspx. All websites last visited on 21/01/2021.

Breeze, Ruth. “Imagining the Nation in British Politics.” Discourse Studies in Public Communication. Edited by Eliecer Crespo-Fernández. London: John Benjamins. 16-38.

Brookes, Rod. “Newspapers and National Identity: The BSE/CJD Crisis and the British Press.” Media, Culture & Society 21.2 (1999): 247-263.

Bucholtz, Mary and Kira Hall. “Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach.” Discourse Studies 7.4-5 (2005): 585–614.

Charteris-Black, Jonathan. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004a.

---. Politicians and Rhetoric: The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004b.

Chilton, Paul and George Lakoff. “Foreign Policy by Metaphor.” Language and Peace. Edited by Christina Schäffner and Anita Wenden. Aldershot: Ashgate, 1995. 37–55.

Citrin, Jack, Cara Wong and Brian Duff. “The Meaning of American National Identity. Patterns of Ethnic Conflict and Consensus.” Social Identity, Intergroup

Conflict and Conflict Reduction. Edited by Richard Ashmore, Lee Jussim and David Wilder. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. 71-100.

Coffrey-Glover, Laura. Men in Women’s Worlds: Constructions of Masculinity in Women’s Magazines. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2019.

Greene, Jennifer, Valerie Caracelli and Wendy Graham. “Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-method Evaluation Designs.” Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 11.3 (1989): 255–274.

Hall, Stuart. “Introduction: Who Needs ‘Identity’?” Questions of Cultural Identity. Edited by Stuart Hall and Paul Du Gay. London: Sage, 1996. 1-17.

---. “Old and New Ethnicities.” Culture, Globalisation and the World System. Edited by Anthony King. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press, 1997. 19-40.

---. “The Question of Cultural Identity.” Modernity and Its Futures. Edited by Stuart Hall, David Held and Anthony McGrew. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992. 274-316.

Hardie, Andrew. “CQPweb—Combining Power, Flexibility and Usability in a Corpus Analysis Tool.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 17.3 (2012): 380–409.

Holland, Jack and Ben Fermor. “The Discursive Hegemony of Trump’s Jacksonian Populism: Race, Class, and Gender in Constructions and Contestations of US National Identity, 2016–2018.” Politics 41.1 (2020): 64-79.

Hunston, Susan. Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.

KhosraviNik, Majid. Discourse, Identity and Legitimacy: Self and Other in Representations of Iran’s Nuclear Programme. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2015.

Lakoff, George. Don’t Think of an Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate: The Essential Guide for Progressives. White River Junction: Chelsea Green, 2004.

Li, Juan. “Intertextuality and National Identity: Discourse of National Conflicts in Daily Newspapers in the United States and China.” Discourse & Society 20.1 (2009): 85-121.

Llamas, Carmen and Dominic Watt. Language and Identities. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2010.

McCarthy, Tom. “US Still Outdoes All Other Countries for National Pride.” The Guardian 9 May 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/may/07/us-outdoes-other-countries-national-pride.

Musolff, Andreas. “Nations as Persons: Collective Identities in Conflict.” The Discursive Construction of Identities On- and Offline: Personal – Group – Collective. Edited by Birte Bös et al. London: John Benjamins, 2018. 249-266.

Schoemaker, Sydney. “Identity & Identities.” Daedalus (Fall 2006): 40–48.

Similarweb. “vogue.com traffic overview.” 2020. https://www.similarweb.com/website/vogue.com/#overview.

Statista. “Reach of Popular Magazines in the United States in June 2019.” 2019. https://www.statista.com/statistics/208807/estimated-print-audience-of-popular-magazines/.

Taylor Annabell and Angelique Nairn. “Flagging a ‘New’ New Zealand: The Discursive Construction of National Identity in the Flag Consideration Project.” Critical Discourse Studies 16.1 (2019): 96-111.

Wodak, Ruth, et al. The Discursive Construction of National Identity. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2009.

Wodak, Ruth and Michał Krzyżanowski. “Right-wing Populism in Europe & USA: Contesting Politics & Discourse beyond ‘Orbanism’ and ‘Trumpism.’” Journal of Language and Politics 16.4 (2017): 471-484.

Yadlin-Segal, Aya. “Constructing National Identity Online: The Case Study of #IranJeans on Twitter.” International Journal of Communication 11 (2017): 2760-2783.

Downloads

Published

2021-06-18

Issue

No. 17 (2021): Cinema, Migration, and the US

Section

Articles (general section) - English language and linguistics

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Angela Zottola, Virginia Zorzi

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 Iperstoria is an Open Access journal.
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 BY-NC License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of their work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. We require authors to inform us of any instances of re-publication.