The Impact of Polarised Social Media Networking Communications in the #Longcovid Debate between Ideologies and Scientific Facts
A Language Analysis from a Corpus of Posts on Twitter/X
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13136/2281-4582/2024.i23.1450Keywords:
Covid-19, discourse of pandemics, Long Covid, social media networking interactions, corpus linguisticsAbstract
The Covid-19 pandemic has shaped many conventions in social, cultural and linguistic terms. Its outbreak in early 2020 sparked an unprecedented R&D effort (Pedrini 2021; Burgess et al. 2021) by the international scientific community in developing effective vaccines (Knoll and Wonodi 2020). Indeed, these vaccines helped the world to return to normal life, though the vaccines’ effectiveness was questioned (Andrews et al. 2022).
The global debate concerning Covid-19 issues has not come to an end, especially in online and digital environments. Media play roles in creating and shaping representation(s) and truth(s) (Garfin et al. 2020; Chaiuk and Dunaievska 2020), but it is on social media networking platforms that discussions have been leading to patterns of polarisation. A case in point is Long Covid, or post-Covid-19 condition, defined “as a variety of mid- and long-term effects after [people] recover from their initial illness” (WHO 2021). Online discussion about this topic has increased over time.
The aim of this study is to present the results of an analysis of a corpus of automatically-retrieved (Brooker, Barnett and Cribbin 2016) social media networking content from Twitter (now called “X”) in a 13-week timespan (September 2022–November 2022) and made up of almost 600,000 tweets. The 2.5M-token corpus of tweets is investigated using quantitative and qualitative approaches (Stefanowitsch 2020) to retrieve data on users’ reactions about Long Covid. Some of these statements reflect conspiracy-based theories involving vaccination, fake news and post-truths, clashing with scientific evidence. Other tweets reflect supportive stances, thus leading to forms of ambient affiliation (Zappavigna 2011).
References
Al-Amer, Rasmieh, et al. “Emotional Reaction to the First Dose of COVID-19 Vaccine: Postvaccination Decline in Anxiety and Stress among Anxious Individuals and Increase among Individuals with Normal Prevaccination Anxiety Levels.” Journal of Personalized Medicine 12.912 (2022).
Andrews, Nick, et al. “COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness against the Omicron (B.1.1.529) Variant.” The New England Journal of Medicine 386 (2022): 1532-1546.
Nelson, Anitra. “COVID-19: Capitalist and Postcapitalist Perspectives.” Human Geography 13.3 (2020): 305-309.
Anthony, Lawrence. “AntConc” (Version 3.4.3.0) [Computer Software]. Waseda University, Tokyo.
---. “AntConc (Version 3.5.8)” [Computer Software]. Waseda University, Tokyo.
Awoyemi, Toluwalase, et al. “Twitter Sentiment Analysis of Long COVID Syndrome.” Cureus 14.6 (2022): e25901.
Azcue, Naiara, et al. “Brain Fog of Post‑COVID‑19 Condition and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Same Medical Disorder?” Journal of Translational Medicine 20.569 (2022).
Badaan, Vivienne, et al. “Ideological Asymmetries in Online Hostility, Intimidation, Obscenity, and Prejudice.” Nature Scientific Reports 13 (2023): 22345.
Baker, Paul. Using corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum, 2006.
Ben-Elia, Eran and Feng Zhen. “ICT, Activity Space–Time and Mobility: New Insights, New Models, New Methodologies.” Transportation 45 (2018): 267-272.
Birchall, Clare and Peter Knight. Conspiracy Theories in the time of COVID-19. London: Routledge, 2022.
Brandtzaeg, Petter B. and Marika Lüders. “Time Collapse in Social Media: Extending the Context Collapse” Social Media+Society 4.1 (2018): 1-10.
Brooker, Phillip, Julie Barnett and Timothy Cribbin. “Doing Social Media Analytics.” Big Data & Society 3.2 (2016): 1-12.
Burgess, Hayley, et al. “COVID-19: The Vaccine Race Continues.” Healthcare Journal of Medicine 2.2 (2021): 81-91.
Callard, Felicity and Elisa Perego. “How and Why Patients Made Long Covid.” Social Science & Medicine 268 (2021):113426.
Chaiuk, Tetyana and Olha V. Dunaievska. “Fear Culture in Media: An Examination on Coronavirus Discourse.” Journal of History Culture and Art Research 9.2 (2020): 184-194.
Cosentino, Gabriele. Social Media and the Post-Truth World Order: The Global Dynamics of Disinformation. Cham: Palgrave, 2020.
Cucinotta, Domenico and Maurizio Vanelli. “WHO Declares COVID-19 a Pandemic.” Acta Biomed 91.1 (2020): 157-160.
D’Ancona, Matthew. Post-Truth: The New War on Truth and How to Fight Back. London: Ebury Press, 2017.
Damota, Mulugeta Deribe. “The Effect of Social Media on Society.” New Media and Mass Communication 78 (2019): 7-11.
Davis, Hannah, et al. “Long COVID: Major Findings, Mechanisms and Recommendations.” Nature Reviews Microbiology 21 (2023): 133-146.
Dolatabadi, Elham, et al. “Using Social Media to Help Understand Long COVID Patient Reported Health Outcomes: A Natural Language Processing Approach.” J Med Internet Res. (2023): 25:e45767.
Garfin, Dana Rose, Roxane Silver Cohen and Alison E. Holman. “The Novel Coronavirus (COVID-2019) Outbreak: Amplification of Public Health Consequences by Media Exposure.” Health Psychology 39.5 (2020): 355-357.
Georgalou, Mariza. Discourse and Identity on Facebook. London: Bloomsbury, 2017.
Grego, Kim. “COVID-19 ‘Brain Fog’ Narratives in Institutional, News Media and Academic Sources.” Communicating medical science in the digital age: culture, knowledge, expertise, practices, 2nd International CIRLaM Conference 25-26-27 May 2023, Naples, Italy. Conference paper.
Hinton, Sam and Larissa Hjorth. Understanding Social Media. London: Sage, 2013.
Hoffmann, Christian R. and Wolfram Bublitz, edited by. Pragmatics of Social Media. Berlin: De Gruyter, 2017.
Kapoor, Kawaljeet Kaur, et al. “Advances in Social Media Research: Past, Present and Future.” Information System Frontiers 20 (2018): 531-558.
Katella, Kathy. “Comparing the COVID-19 Vaccines: How Are They Different?” Yale Medicine 24 April 2024. https://www.yalemedicine.org/news/covid-19-vaccine-comparison.
Khan, Madiha. “#MedTwitter: The Good, the Bad, and the Surprisingly Useful.” Nejm Journal Watch 5 April 2022. https://blogs.jwatch.org/general-medicine/index.php/2022/04/medtwitter-the-good-the-bad-and-the-surprisingly-useful/.
KhosraviNik, Maijd. “Digital Meaning-Making across Content and Practice in Social Media Critical Discourse Studies.” Critical Discourse Studies 19.2 (2022): 119-123.
Knoll, Maria Deloria and Chizoba Wonodi. “Oxford–AstraZeneca COVID-19 Vaccine Efficacy.” The Lancet 397.10269 (2021): 72-74.
Li, Junjiang and Philippe Giabbanelli. “Returning to a Normal Life via COVID-19 Vaccines in the United States: A Large-scale Agent-Based Simulation Study.” JMIR Med Inform 9.4 (2021): e27419.
Liu, Sixiao and Haoran Chu. “Examining the Direct and Indirect Effects of Trust in Motivating Covid-19 Vaccine Uptake.” Patient Education and Counseling 105 (2022): 2096-2102.
Mayo Clinic. “Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS).” https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/chronic-fatigue-syndrome/symptoms-causes/syc-20360490.
McIntyre, Lee. Post-Truth. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2018.
Meledandri, Francesco. “A Jab to Medical Facts: Sentiment of the Twittersphere in COVID-19 Vaccination Official Discourse: A Uk-Italy Comparison.” ESP across Cultures 20 (2024, in press).
---. “Out-of-the-(ballot)box: Legitimation of a New Popular Will in Brexit-related Social Media Engagement.” Thinking Out of the Box in English Linguistics, Language Teaching, Translation and Terminology. Proceedings of the XXIX AIA Conference. Edited by Katherine Ackerley, et al. Padova: Padova University Press, 2023. 157-182.
Pedrini, Giulia. “’The ‘Vaccine Race’: Metaphorical Conceptualizations of the Search of an Immunization Against COVID-19.” International Journal of Translation 33 (2021): 129-152.
Polack, Fernando, et al. “Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine.” The New England Journal of Medicine 383.27 (2020): 2603-2615.
Saladino, Valeria, Davide Algeri and Vincenzo Auriemma. “The Psychological and Social Impact of COVID-19: New Perspectives of Well-Being.” Frontiers in Psychology 11 (2020): 1-6.
Schulman, Roy. “COVID-19 and the Post-Truth Age: The Role of Facts in Public Policy” Online conference, 15 June 2020: https://www.inss.org.il/publication/coronavirus-and-post-truth-seminar/.
Shaw, David. “Invisible Enemies: Coronavirus and Other Hidden Threats.” Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 17 (2020): 531-534.
Stefanowitsch, Anatol. Corpus Linguistics: A Guide to the Methodology. Berlin: Language Science Press, 2020.
Sussman, Kristen, et al. “COVID-19 Topics and Emotional Frames in Vaccine Hesitation: A Social Media Text and Sentiment Analysis.” Digital Health 9 (2023): 1-11.
Tamássy, Réka and Zsuzsanna Géring. “Rich Variety of DA Approaches Applied in Social Media Research: A Systematic Scoping Review.” Discourse & Communication 16.1 (2022): 93-109.
United Nations. “United Nations Comprehensive Response To COVID-19. Saving Lives, Protecting Societies, Recovering Better. 2021 update.” https://reliefweb.int/report/world/united-nations-comprehensive-response-covid-19-saving-lives-protecting-societies.
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. “ME/CFS Basics.” https://www.cdc.gov/me-cfs/about/index.html.
Voysey, Merryn, et al. “Safety and Efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 Vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: An Interim Analysis of Four Randomised Controlled Trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK.” The Lancet 397.10269 (2021): 99-111.
Wong, Timothy and Danielle J. Weitzer. “Long COVID and Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS)—A Systemic Review and Comparison of Clinical Presentation and Symptomatology.” Medicina 57:418 (2021).
World Health Organization. “A Clinical Case Definition of Post Covid-19 Condition by A Delphi Consensus, 6 October 2021” World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-2019-nCoV-Post_COVID-19_condition-Clinical_case_definition-2021.1.
---. “Post COVID-19 Condition (Long COVID).” https://www.who.int/europe/news-room/fact-sheets/item/post-covid-19-condition.
---. “Statement on the Fifteenth meeting of the IHR (2005) Emergency Committee on the COVID-19 Pandemic.” https://www.who.int/news/item/05-05-2023-statement-on-the-fifteenth-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-19)-pandemic.
Zappavigna, Michele. “Ambient Affiliation: A Linguistic Perspective on Twitter.” New Media Society 13 (2011): 788-806.
---. Discourse of Twitter and Social Media: How We Use Language to Create Affiliation on the Web. London: Continuum, 2012.
---. “Searchable Talk: The Linguistic Functions of Hashtags.” Social Semiotics 25.3 (2015): 274-291.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Francesco Meledandri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Iperstoria is an Open Access journal.- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 BY-NC License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of their work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. We require authors to inform us of any instances of re-publication.
