The Discursive (De)Construction of Climate Change Advocacy
Framing the US Green New Deal Resolution
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13136/2281-4582/2022.i20.1232Parole chiave:
climate activism, climate change, argumentative framing, policy debates, social media communicationAbstract
This paper studies the climate-related discourses of two (sets of) actors with a significant following on the two poles of the current US climate debate: the climate advocacy of one of the most vociferous US environmentalists in office, House Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and the delegitimizing climate counternarratives fashioned by mainstream conservative media outlet Fox News. Specifically, it centres on the processes that govern the argumentative framing of the 2019 policy proposal known as the (US) Green New Deal Resolution (GND) within Rep. Ocasio-Cortez’s tweets and news segments on the GND posted on the official Fox News YouTube site. Guided by the analytical framework delineated in Fairclough and Mădroane (2020), this paper seeks to lay bare the ways in which these two deliberating agents made selected premises salient and overriding, used linguistic devices to (re)define and (re)categorize phenomena, and had recourse to macro speech acts such as explanations and narratives to support their intended aims. In exposing the mechanisms that govern the framing of the critical issue of climate change and the debate of an environmental policy, it hopes to contribute to understanding how framing strategies are employed within policy debates that unfold in less formal contexts and to shed light on the communication of climate-related issues in ways that more effectively resonate with the public and counteract climate scepticism and denial.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Alexander, Richard J. “Investigating Texts about Environmental Degradation Using Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistic Techniques.” The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics. Edited by Alwin F. Fill and Hermine Penz. New York: Routledge, 2018. 196-210.
Angstrom, Jan. “Mapping the Competing Historical Analogies of the War on Terrorism.” International Relations 25.2 (2011): 224-242.
Boyle, Alaina D., et al. “Green New Deal Proposals: Comparing Emerging Transformational Climate Policies at Multiple Scales.” Energy Research & Social Science 81 (2021): 1-12.
Entman, Robert M. “Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm.” Journal of Communication 43.4 (1993): 51-58.
Ereaut, Gill and Nat Segnit. “Warm Words: How are we Telling the Climate Story and can we Tell it Better?” Technical Report. London: Institute for Public Policy Research, 2006. 1-32.
Feldman, Lauren, et al. “Climate on Cable: The Nature and Impact of Global Warming Coverage on Fox News, CNN, and MSNBC.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 17.1 (2012): 3-31.
Foust, Christina R. and William O’Shannon Murphy. “Revealing and Reframing Apocalyptic Tragedy in Global Warming Discourse.” Environmental Communication 3.2 (2009): 151-167.
Fairclough, Isabela and Irina Diana Mădroane. “An Argumentative Approach to ‘Framing.’” Co-herencia 17.32 (2020): 119-158.
Fillmore, Charles J. “Frames and the Semantics of Understanding.” Quaderni di Semantica 6.2 (1985): 222-254.
Fillmore, Charles J. and Beryl T. Atkins. “Toward a Frame-Based Lexicon: The Semanticcs of RISK and its Neighbors.” Frames, Fields, and Contrasts. Edited by Adrienne Lehrer and Eva Feder Kittay. New York: Routledge, 1992. 75-102.
Galvin, Ray and Nel Healy. “The Green New Deal in the United States.” Energy Research & Social Science 67 (2020): 1-9.
Guber, Deborah Lynn, Jeremiah Bohr and Riley E. Dunlap. ‘Time to Wake Up’: Climate change Advocacy in a Polarized Congress, 1996-2015. Environmental Politics 30.4 (2021): 538-558.
Gustafson, Abel, et al. “The Development of Partisan Polarization over the Green New Deal.” Nature Climate Change 9.12 (2019): 940-944.
Leiserowitz, Anthony, et al. “Global Warming’s Six Americas.” Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 42 (2021): 97-103.
Lejano, Raul P. and Shondel Nero. The Power of Narrative: Climate Skepticism and the Deconstruction of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2020.
Lybrand, Holmes and Brandon Miller. “Fact-Checking Trump, AOC Climate Claims.” CNN 24 January 2019. https://edition.cnn.com/2019/01/24/politics/fact-check-trump-aoc-climate/index.html. Last visited 12/12/2022.
McCright, Aaron M. and Riley E. Dunlap. “Anti-Reflexivity.” Theory, Culture & Society 27.2-3 (2010): 100-133.
Reisigl, Martin and Ruth Wodak. Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge, 2000.
Risbey, James S. “The New Climate Discourse: Alarmist or Alarming?” Global Environmental Change 18.1 (2008): 26-37.
Sacco, Vincent. When Crime Waves. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 2005.
Stibbe, Arran. “Positive Discourse Analysis: Rethinking Human Ecological Relationships.” The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics. Edited by Alwin F. Fill and Hermine Penz. New York: Routledge, 2018. 165-179.
van Dijk, Teun A. Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. London: Sage, 1998.
---. “Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse & Society 4.2 (1993): 249-283.
van Leeuwen, Theo. “Legitimation in Discourse and Communication.” Discourse & Communication 1.1 (2007): 91-112.
van Wijk, Josef and Itay Fischhendler. “The Construction of Urgency Discourse around Mega-projects.” Policy Sci 50 (2017): 469-494.
Dowloads
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2022 Jacqueline Aiello
Questo volume è pubblicato con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale 4.0 Internazionale.
Iperstoria è una rivista accademica ad accesso libero.
a. Gli autori detengono il copyright e danno alla rivista il diritto per la prima pubblicazione con il contributo sotto licenza Creative Commons che permette di condividere l’articolo con il riconoscimento della prima pubblicazione su questa rivista.
b. Gli autori possono inoltre stabilire ulteriori direttive contrattuali per la distribuzione non esclusiva della versione del contributo pubblicata sulla rivista (es. ripubblicarlo in archivi istituzionali o in un volume), con uno specifico riconoscimento della prima pubblicazione su questa rivista. Chiediamo pertanto agli autori di contattarci nel caso di eventuali ripubblicazioni.
