Face Masks and User-Generated Discourse in the Covid-19 Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13136/2281-4582/2024.i23.1447Parole chiave:
EnglishAbstract
Ensuing the World Health Organization’s (WHO) announcement on 11 March 2020 that Covid-19 had become a global pandemic, many governments worldwide introduced wearing masks as one of the primary measures to abide by in order to limit the spread of the virus. Since then, face masks have become one of the main symbols of the pandemic.
Although their effectiveness in reducing the spread of Covid-19 infection has been backed by scientific evidence, wearing face masks has triggered a significant debate, mostly on social media (Baker, Concannon and So 2022; Al-Ramahi et al. 2021). User-generated discourse has expanded dramatically during the pandemic due to the enhanced online interaction possibilities. In particular, mask aversion is still perceived and represented online as an antisocial norm that has emerged during the current Covid-19 pandemic (Kim 2022).
This study examines the reactions of Facebook and Twitter users to a recent new Coronavirus alert raised by New York City in response to rising cases, recommending, though not requiring, people to wear masks in public indoor settings. The comments posted were analysed using the basic methodology of Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis (CMDA), which allows the identification of patterns in interactive message content (Herring 2010), and interpreted through a Critical Discourse Analysis lens to investigate the reasons of Internet users for and against wearing masks as a mitigation measure against Covid-19 spread. A quantitative and qualitative research approach was employed to analyse conversational and behavioural data in the social media discourse framed by the two factions supporting or contrasting mask wearing (Lang, Erickson and Jing-Schmidt 2021; Franz et al. 2019; Martin and White 2005). In addition, this study attempted to assess the variance in response to the same content posted on different platforms.
The results show that social media can be a valuable source of data mining that could help decision-makers better understand the public discourse around crucial public health issues like wearing masks to curb the Coronavirus pandemic and effectively address public perception by adopting more suitable policies.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Al-Ramahi, Mohammad, et al. “Public Discourse Against Masks in the COVID-19 Era: Infodemiology Study of Twitter Data.” JMIR Public Health Surveillance 7.4 (2021): e26780.
Baker, Hannah, Shauna Concannon and Emily So. “Information Sharing Practices During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Case Study About Face Masks.” Plos One 17.5 (2022): e0268043.
Baker, Paul. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum, 2006.
Betsch, Cornelia. “How Behavioural Science Data Helps Mitigate the COVID-19 Crisis.” Nature Human Behaviour 4.438 (2020).
Betsch, Cornelia, et al. “Social and Behavioral Consequences of Mask Policies During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 117.36 (2020): 21851-21853.
Bokemper, Scott E., et al. “Experimental Evidence That Changing Beliefs About Mask Efficacy and Social Norms Increase Mask Wearing for COVID-19 Risk Reduction: Results from the United States and Italy.” Plos One 16.10 (2021): e0258282.
Dynel, Marta. “COVID-19 Memes Going Viral: On the Multiple Multimodal Voices Behind Face Masks.” Discourse and Society 32.2 (2021): 175-195.
Eikenberry, Steffen E., et al. “To Mask or Not to Mask: Modeling the Potential for Face Mask Use by the General Public to Curtail the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Infectious Disease Modelling 5 (2020): 293-308.
Fairclough, Norman. Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1992.
Franz, Daschel, et al. “Using Facebook for Qualitative Research: A Brief Primer.” Journal of Medical Internet Research 21.8 (2019): e13544.
Garzone, Giuliana E., Maria C. Paganoni and Martin Reisigl, edited by. “Discursive Representations of Controversial Issues in Medicine and Health.” Lingue Culture Mediazioni 6.1 (2019).
Herring, Susan C. “Computer-Mediated Conversation: Introduction and Overview.” Language@Internet 7 (2010): Article 2.
Hopfer, Suellen, et al. “The Social Amplification and Attenuation of COVID-19 Risk Perception Shaping Mask Wearing Behavior: A Longitudinal Twitter Analysis.” Plos One 16.9 (2021): e0257428.
Howard, Jeremy, et al. “An Evidence Review of Face Masks Against COVID-19.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118.4 (2021): e2014564118.
Jaworski, Adam and Nikolas Coupland, edited by. The Discourse Reader. 3rd edition. New York: Routledge, 2014.
Jing-Schmidt, Zhuo. “Negativity Bias in Language: A Cognitive-Affective Model of Emotive Intensifiers.” Cognitive Linguistics 18.3 (2007): 417-443.
Kim, Yunhwan. “#Nomask on Instagram: Exploring Visual Representations of the Antisocial Norm on Social Media.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19.11(2022): 6857.
Lang, Jun, Wesley W. Erickson and Zhuo Jing-Schmidt. “#MaskOn! #MaskOff! Digital Polarisation of Mask-Wearing in the United States During COVID-19.” Plos One 16.4 (2021): e0250817.
Martin, James R. and Peter R.R. White. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
Martinelli, Lucia, et al. “Face Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Simple Protection Tool With Many Meanings.” Frontiers in Public Health 8 (2021): 606635.
Oxman, Andrew D., et al. “Health Communication in and Out of Public Health Emergencies: To Persuade or to Inform?” Health Research Policy and Systems 20.1.28 (2022): 10.1186/s12961-022-00828-z.
Paltridge, Brian. Discourse Analysis. Continuum: London, 2006.
Pascual-Ferrá, Paola, et al. “Toxicity and Verbal Aggression on Social Media: Polarised Discourse on Wearing Face Masks During the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Big Data & Society 8.1 (2021): 10.1177/20539517211023533.
Rasulo, Margaret. “RUMOR HAS IT: The COVID-19 Infodemic as the Repository of Conspiracy.” Lingue e Linguaggi 47 (2022): 159-190.
Social Media Research Group. “Using Social Media for Social Research: An Introduction.” Government Social Research. Gov. UK, 2016. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk//26600/.
Taylor, Steven and Gordon J. G. Asmundson. “Negative Attitudes About Facemasks During the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Dual Importance of Perceived Ineffectiveness and Psychological Reactance.” Plos One 16.2 (2021): e0246317.
Tennent, Emma and Fiona Grattan. “The Anatomy of a Conspiracy Theory in Covid-19 Political Commentary.” Language in Society 52 (2022): 1-22.
Van Dijk, Theo A. “Discourse Analysis as Ideology Analysis.” Language and Peace. Edited by Christina Schäffner and Anita L. Wenden. Amsterdam: Harwood, 1999. 17.
Volkova, Svitlana, et al. “Inferring Latent User Properties from Texts Published in Social Media.” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence 29.1 (2015): 4296-4297.
World Health Organization. “Advice on the Use of Masks in the Context of COVID-19: Interim Guidance, 6 April 2020.” https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/331693.
---. “Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Advice for the Public: When and How to Use Masks.” https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/advice-for-public/when-and-how-to-use-masks.
---. “Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Masks.” https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/question-and-answers-hub/q-a-detail/coronavirus-disease-COVID-19-masks.
World Population Review. “Countries With Mask Mandates 2022.” https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/countries-with-mask-mandates.
Zareva, Alla and Hailey Zamora. “Politicising the Discourse of Mask Wearing in U.S. Digital News. Reports during Covid-19: A Corpus-based Study.” Analysing Health Discourse in Digital Environments: Current Paradigms and Practices. Edited by Anna Franca Plastina. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2022. 72-90.
Dowloads
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2024 Elena Intorcia
Questo volume è pubblicato con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione - Non commerciale 4.0 Internazionale.
Iperstoria è una rivista accademica ad accesso libero.
a. Gli autori detengono il copyright e danno alla rivista il diritto per la prima pubblicazione con il contributo sotto licenza Creative Commons che permette di condividere l’articolo con il riconoscimento della prima pubblicazione su questa rivista.
b. Gli autori possono inoltre stabilire ulteriori direttive contrattuali per la distribuzione non esclusiva della versione del contributo pubblicata sulla rivista (es. ripubblicarlo in archivi istituzionali o in un volume), con uno specifico riconoscimento della prima pubblicazione su questa rivista. Chiediamo pertanto agli autori di contattarci nel caso di eventuali ripubblicazioni.