The ‘Transparency Effect’ in Pharmaceutical ESG Reports
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13136/2281-4582/2025.i25.1510Parole chiave:
englishAbstract
As the pharmaceutical sector has become increasingly competitive, companies have adopted a plethora of strategies and practices not only to publicise their products but also to be perceived by stakeholders as transparent and, by way of implication, honest and ethical. Drawing on a corpus of English-language Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) reports, this study investigates the complexity and dynamism of the discursive strategies used by leading pharmaceutical companies listed on the stock exchange to build and enhance an image of transparency and credibility. By distinguishing between the level of the utterance – what is being communicated – and the enunciational level (Greimas & Courtés 2007; Greimas 1983), which regards the writer and the context of enunciation, this paper conducts a semio-linguistic analysis in an attempt to explore different construals of transparency and opacity. The discourse of pharmaceutical companies is revealed as a sophisticated communicative construct, where various strategies are employed to create meaning effects that are used to foster an image of transparency and boost stakeholders’ trust.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Austin, John. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975.
Cap, Piotr. “Language and Legitimization: Developments in the Proximization Model of Political Discourse Analysis.” Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 1 (2005): 7-36.
---. “Towards the Proximization Model of the Analysis of Legitimization in Political Discourse.” Journal of Pragmatics 40.1 (2008): 17-41.
Desideri, Paola. Il potere della parola. Il linguaggio politico di Bettino Craxi. Venezia: Marsilio, 1987.
Devrim, Devo Y. “Grammatical Metaphor: What do we Mean? What Exactly are we Researching?” Functional Linguistics 2.3 (2015): 1-15.
Floch, Jean-Marie. Forme dell’impronta. Cinque fotografie di Brandt, Cartier-Bresson, Doisneau, Stieglitz, Strand. Roma: Meltemi, 2003.
Greimas, Algirdas Julien. “A proposito del gioco.” Edited by Francesco Marsciani. Bologna: Esculapio, 1995. 215-220.
---. Du sens II. Essais sémiotiques. Paris: Seuil, 1983.
---. Sémantique structurale. Recherche de méthode. Paris: Larousse, 1966.
Greimas, Algirdas Julien and Joseph Courtés. Semiotica. Dizionario ragionato della teoria del linguaggio. Italian trans. by Paolo Fabbri. Milano: Bruno Mondadori, 2007.
Halliday, Michael A. K. and Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold, 2014.
Langacker, Ronald W. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
---. “Subjectification.” Cognitive Linguistics 1 (1990): 5-38.
Lovejoy, K. Brian and Donald M. Lance. “Discourse Analysis: Part I, Information Management and Cohesion” (1988): 1-59. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED310383.pdf. Last visited 23/03/2024.
Padoan, Tatzuma. Attori, reti e linguaggi dell’esperienza religiosa. Indagini semiotiche sulle strategie di enunciazione nel discorso religioso giapponese. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University Ca’ Foscari - Venezia, 2010.
Quirk, Randolph, et al. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman, 1985.
Searle, John. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.
Sulkunen, Pekka and Jukka Törrönen. “Constructing Speaker Images: The Problem of Enunciation in Discourse Analysis.” Semiotica 115 (1997): 121-146.
Thompson, Geoff. Introducing Functional Grammar. London: Arnold, 2004.
“Transparent.” Merriam-Webster.com Dictionary. www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/
transparent. Last visited 23/03/2024.
Valdovinos, Jorge. “Transparency as Ideology, Ideology as Transparency: Towards a Critique of the Meta-aesthetics of Neoliberal Hegemony.” Open Cultural Studies 2 (2018): 654-667.
Yule, George. Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Dowloads
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2025 Andrea Fenice, Renzo Mocini
Questo volume è pubblicato con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
Iperstoria è una rivista accademica ad accesso libero.
a. Gli autori e le autrici detengono il copyright e danno alla rivista il diritto per la prima pubblicazione con il contributo sotto licenza Creative Commons BY (4.0) che permette di condividere l’articolo con il riconoscimento della prima pubblicazione su questa rivista.
b. Gli autori e le autrici possono inoltre stabilire ulteriori direttive contrattuali per la distribuzione non esclusiva della versione del contributo pubblicata sulla rivista (es. ripubblicarlo in archivi istituzionali o in un volume), con uno specifico riconoscimento della prima pubblicazione su questa rivista. Chiediamo pertanto agli autori e autrici di contattarci nel caso di eventuali ripubblicazioni.
