The Changing Discourse of YouTube’s About Us Page
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13136/2281-4582/2025.i26.1642Parole chiave:
About Us page genre, Appraisal Theory, Corporate discourse, Multimodality, Systemic-functional linguisticsAbstract
The paper examines the evolving discourse of YouTube’s About Us page through a multimodal linguistic lens. It analyzes two iterations of the page (2019-2021 and 2021-present) in comparison with TikTok’s corresponding section, tracing how corporate self-representation is linguistically and visually constructed across time. The About Us page is approached as a multimodal genre (Garzone and Catenaccio 2021; Petroni 2020) in which linguistic, visual and compositional resources combine to construct corporate ethos and discursive identity. Grounded in Systemic Functional Linguistics (Halliday 2007 [1975]; 1978), Appraisal Theory (Martin and White 2005), and Multimodal Ideational Mapping (Moschini 2022), the study focuses on the ideational metafunction as the axis through which experience is represented and specific worldviews are naturalized. Multimodal Ideational Mapping (MIM) is employed as an interpretive framework to trace how ideational meanings are distributed across language, image and layout, and how recurrent conceptual nuclei emerge through their intersemiotic alignment. By reinstating Halliday’s notion of context of culture as a historical and ideational environment, the analysis connects local semiotic choices to broader cultural scripts that inform platform self-representation. The findings suggest that YouTube’s corporate discourse underwent a partial reorientation after the global diffusion of TikTok in 2020: from a participatory and civic-oriented rhetoric associated with the Californian Ideology (Turner 2006; Barbrook and Cameron 1996) toward a mode of self-presentation increasingly grounded in aesthetic pleasure and emotional engagement.
Riferimenti bibliografici
Askehave, Inger and Anne Ellerup Nielsen. “Web-Mediated Genres: A Challenge to Traditional Genre Theory.” Working Paper/Center for Virksomhedskommunikation, Handelshøjskolen i Århus6. Aarhus: Aarhus School of Business, Center for Virksomhedskommunikation, 2004.
Barbrook, Richard and Andy Cameron. “The Californian Ideology.” Science as Culture 6.1 (1996): 44-72.
Bateman, John A. Multimodality and Genre: A Foundation for the Systematic Analysis of Multimodal Documents. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008.
Bateman, John A., Janina Wildfeuer and Tuomo Hiippala. Multimodality: Foundations, Research and Analysis – A Problem-Oriented Introduction. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2017.
Bhatia, Vijay. Analysing Genre: Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman, 1993.
---. Worlds of Written Discourse: A Genre-Based View. London: Continuum, 2004.
Brand, Stewart, ed. Whole Earth Catalog. Menlo Park: Portola Institute, 1968-1972.
de Tocqueville, Alexis. Democracy in America. 1835. Translated by Harvey C. Mansfield and Delba Winthrop. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.
Dixon, Simon J, “Global Social Networks Ranked by Number of Users.” Statista 29 April 2024. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/. All websites last visited on 18/12/2025.
Foucault, Michel. The Archaeology of Knowledge. 1969. Trans. Alan M. Sheridan Smith. London: Routledge, 1989.
Garzone, Giuliana and Paola Catenaccio. Ethics in Professional and Corporate Communication. Berlin: Frank and Timme, 2021.
Halliday, Michael A. K. Language and Society. 1975. Edited by Jonathan J. Webster. London: Continuum, 2007.
---. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning. London: Edward Arnold, 1978.
Halliday, Michael A. K. and Ruqaiya Hasan. Language, Context, and Text: Aspects of Language in a Social-Semiotic Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985.
Hodge, Robert and Gunther Kress. Language as Ideology. 1979. London: Routledge, 1993.
Jenkins, Henry. Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture. New York: Routledge, 1992.
Kalye, Anna and Jakob Nielsen. “About Us Information on Corporate Websites.” Nielsen Norman Group, 26 May 2019. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/about-us-information-on-websites/.
Kress, Gunther and Theo van Leeuwen. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. 1996. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 2006.
Liu, Yu and Kay L. O’Halloran. “Intersemiotic Texture: Analyzing Cohesive Devices Between Language and Images.” Social Semiotics 19.4 (2009): 367-388.
Machin, David. “What is Multimodal Critical Discourse Studies?” Critical Discourse Studies 10.4 (2013): 347-355.
Machin, David and Theo van Leeuwen. “Multimodality, Politics, and Ideology.” Journal of Language and Politics 15.3 (2016): 243-258.
Martin, James Robert and Peter Robert Rupert White. The Language of Evaluation: Appraisal in English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005.
Moschini, Ilaria. “Interview with Theo van Leeuwen.” LEA – Lingue e Letterature d’Oriente e d’Occidente 3 (2014): 203-222.
---. The World as a Global Community? A Critical Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Facebook’s Institutional Communication and Technical Documentation. Arcidosso: Effigi, 2022.
Partington, Alan and Charlotte Taylor. The Language of Persuasion in Politics: An Introduction. London: Routledge, 2018.
Petroni, Sandra. “How to Construct Corporate Identity and Reputation: Is the ‘About Us’ Page a Micro-Genre?” Lingue e Linguaggi 40 (2020): 267-290.
Rheingold, Howard. The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2000.
Roosevelt, Franklin D. State of the Union Address. 6 January 1941. https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/annual-message-congress-the-state-the-union-four-freedoms-speech.
Royce, Terry D. “Intersemiotic Complementarity: A Multimodal Framework for Multimodal Discourse Analysis.” New Directions in the Analysis of Multimodal Discourse. Edited by Terry Royce and Wendy Bowcher. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2007. 63-109.
Swales, John. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
---. Research Genres: Explorations and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Turner, Fred. From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006.
van Leeuwen, Theo. Discourse and Practice: New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Wiener, Norbert. Cybernetics: Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1948.
---. The Human Use of Human Beings: Cybernetics and Society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1950.
Dowloads
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2025 Ilaria Moschini
Questo volume è pubblicato con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
Iperstoria è una rivista accademica ad accesso libero.
a. Gli autori e le autrici detengono il copyright e danno alla rivista il diritto per la prima pubblicazione con il contributo sotto licenza Creative Commons BY (4.0) che permette di condividere l’articolo con il riconoscimento della prima pubblicazione su questa rivista.
b. Gli autori e le autrici possono inoltre stabilire ulteriori direttive contrattuali per la distribuzione non esclusiva della versione del contributo pubblicata sulla rivista (es. ripubblicarlo in archivi istituzionali o in un volume), con uno specifico riconoscimento della prima pubblicazione su questa rivista. Chiediamo pertanto agli autori e autrici di contattarci nel caso di eventuali ripubblicazioni.
