A Corpus-Assisted Contrastive Investigation of Migration-related Terms in British and Italian Political Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13136/2281-4582/2022.i19.1173Keywords:
migrant categories, critical discourse studies, corpus linguistics, populist discourse, political discourseAbstract
Combining the theoretical background of Critical Discourse Studies (van Dijk 2015a, 2015b; van Leeuwen 2008; Wodak 2015a) with a corpus-assisted methodology (van Diik 2015a; 2015b), this paper contrastively investigates the discursive representation of migration and migrant people by leading British (Nigel Farage, Jeremy Corbyn) and Italian politicians (Matteo Salvini, Matteo Renzi) in the years 2016-2018, starting from the examination of the collocational profile of such migration-related terms as immigration, immigrant, migrant, refugee and asylum seeker. The period is salient for the global upsurge of populism (Mudde 2004), the Brexit referendum, and the so-called ‘refugee crisis,’ which turned immigration into a hot topic in the political agenda of parties of different orientations. Our empirical analysis sheds light on two opposing views: the negative portrayal of migrants as a threat by right-wing populist politicians across countries (Lorenzetti 2020), while left-wing politicians display a more humanitarian attitude. Regardless of political stance or specific migrant terms, however, the representation of migrant groups as social actors is crucially founded on the strategies of aggregation, collectivisation and functionalisation (van Leeuwen 2008), which ultimately result in the perpetuation of stereotyped and partial depictions that overlook their features as individuals.
References
Albertazzi, Daniele, Arianna Giovannini and Antonella Seddone. “‘No Regionalism, Please. We Are Leghisti!’ The Transformation of the Italian Lega Nord under the Leadership of Matteo Salvini.” Regional and Federal Studies 28.5 (2018): 645-671.
Allport, Gordon W. The Nature of Prejudice. Boston: The Beacon Press, 1954.
Baker, Paul, Costas Gabrielatos and Tony McEnery. Discourse Analysis and Media Attitudes. The Representation of Islam in the British Press. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Baker, Paul, et al. “A Useful Methodological Synergy? Combining Critical Discourse Analysis and Corpus Linguistics to Examine Discourses of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press.” Discourse & Society 19.3 (2008): 273-306.
Balibar, Étienne. “Is there a ‘neo-racism’?” Race, Nation, Class. Ambiguous Identities. Edited by Étienne Balibar and Immanuel Wellerstein. London: Verso, 1991. 17-28.
Barigazzi, Jacopo. “EU’s External Walls are Dividing Bloc Internally.” Politico 20 November 2021. https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-external-border-walls-divide-countries-internally-poland-belarus-hungary/. (All websites last visited on 07/02/2022).
Bauman, Zygmunt. Liquid Modernity. London: Polity, 2012.
---. Strangers at Our Door. London: Polity, 2016.
Berti, Carlo. “Right-wing Populism and the Criminalization of Sea-Rescue NGOs: The “Sea-
Watch 3” Case in Italy, and Matteo Salvini’s Communication on Facebook.” Media, Culture & Society 43.3 (2021): 532-550.
Best, Joel. Damned Lies, and Statistics. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001.
Billig, Michael. “Rhetorical Uses of Precise Numbers and Semi-Magical Round Numbers in Political Discourse about COVID-19: Examples from the Government of the United Kingdom.” Discourse & Society 32.5 (2021): 542-558.
Bobbio, Norberto. Left and Right: The Significance of a Political Distinction. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1997.
Bordignon, Fabio. “Matteo Renzi: A ‘Leftist Berlusconi’ for the Italian Democratic Party?” South European Society and Politics 19.1 (2014): 1-23.
Caglar, Ayse. “Transnational Migration.” Routledge Handbook of Immigration and Refugee Studies. Edited by Anna Triandafyllidou. London: Routledge, 2015. 64-71.
Camus, Renaud. Le grand remplacement. Paris: Chez l’auteur, 2012.
Canovan, Margaret. “People, Politicians and Populism.” Government and Opposition 19.3 (1984): 312-327.
---. Populism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1981.
Charteris-Black, Jonathan. “Britain as a Container: Immigration Metaphors in the 2005 Election Campaign.” Discourse & Society 15.5 (2006): 563-581.
---. Politicians and Rhetoric. The Persuasive Power of Metaphor. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011.
Chilton, Paul. Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge, 2004.
Collyer, Michael and Heine de Haas. “Developing Dynamic Categorisations of Transit Migration.” Population, Space and Place 18 (2012): 468-481.
Crawley, Heaven and Dimitris Skleparis. “Refugees, Migrants, Neither, Both: Categorical Fetishism and the Politics of Bounding in Europe’s ‘migration crisis’.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44.1 (2018): 48-64.
De Coninck, David. “Migrant Categorization and European Public Opinion: Diverging Attitudes towards Immigrants and Refugees.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 46.9 (2020): 1667-1686.
Demata, Massimiliano. “Populism and Nationalism in Jeremy Corbyn’s Discourse.” Discursive Approaches to Populism across Disciplines. The Return of Populists and the People. Edited by Michael Kranert. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2020. 253-283.
Donadio, Rachel. “The New Populist Playbook.” The Atlantic, 5 September 2019. https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2019/09/matteo-salvini-italy-populist-playbook/597298/.
Eide, Elizabeth. “Strategic Essentalism and Ethnification.” Nordicom Review 31.2 (2010): 63-78.
Fairclough, Norman and Ruth Wodak. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction. Edited by Teun van Dijk. London: SAGE, 1997. 258-284.
Ferguson, Jane. “Afghanistan Has Become the World’s Largest Humanitarian Crisis.” The New Yorker 05 January 2022. https://www.newyorker.com/news/dispatch/afghanistan-has-become-the-worlds-largest-humanitarian-crisis.
Flowerdew, John. “The Discourse of Colonial Withdrawal: A Case Study in the Creation of Mythic Discourse.” Discourse & Society 8.4 (1997): 453-477.
Freeden, Michael. Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1996.
Gabrielatos, Costas and Paul Baker. “’Fleeing, Sneeking, Flooding’: A Corpus Analysis of Discursive Constructions of Refugees and Asylum Seekers in the UK Press, 1996-2005.” Journal of English Linguistics 36.1 (2008): 5-38.
Gietel-Basten, Stuart. “Why Brexit? The Toxic Mix of Immigration and Austerity.” Population and Development Review 42.4 (2016): 673-680.
Goodwin, Matthew. “Why Immigration Was Key to Brexit Vote.” Irish Times 15 May 2017. https://www.irishtimes.com/culture/books/why-immigration-was-key-to-brexit-vote-1.3083608.
Goodwin, Matthew and Caitlin Milazzo. “Taking Back Control? Investigating the Role of Immigration in the 2016 Vote for Brexit.” The British Journal of Politics and International Relations 19.3 (2017): 450-464.
Hawkins, Kirk A. and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser. “The Ideational Approach to Populism.” Latin American Research Review 52.4 (2017): 513-528.
IOM (International Organization for Migration). Global Migration Indicators 2021. Geneva: International Organization for Migration, 2021. www.migrationdataportal.com.
---. Glossary on Migration. Geneva: International Organizaton for Migration, 2019a.
---. World Migration Report 2020. Geneva: International Organization for Migration, 2019b. https://worldmigrationreport.iom.int/wmr-2020-interactive/.
Ivaldi, Gilles, Maria Elisabetta Lanzone and Dwayne Woods. “Varieties of Populism across a Left-Right Spectrum: The Case of the Front National, the Northern League, Podemos and Five Star Movement.” Swiss Political Science Review 23.4 (2017): 354-376.
Katsambekis, Giorgos. “The Populist Surge in Post‐Democratic Times: Theoretical and Political Challenges.” The Political Quarterly 8.2 (2017): 202-210.
KhosraviNik, Majid. “The Representation of Refugees, Asylum Seekers and Immigrants in British Newspapers: A Critical Discourse Analysis.” Journal of Language and Politics 9.1 (2010): 1-28.
Khrishnamurthy, Ramesh. “Ethnic, Racial and Tribal: The Language of Racism?” Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. Edited by Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard and Malcolm Coulthard. London: Routledge, 1996. 129-149.
Lakoff, George. The All New Don’t Think of An Elephant! Know Your Values and Frame the Debate. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing, 2014.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. Tristes tropiques. Paris: Librairie Plon, 1955.
Lorenzetti, Maria Ivana. “A Cross-Linguistic Study of New Populist Language.” Doing Politics. Discursivity, Performativity and Mediation in Political Discourse. Edited by Michael Kranert and Geraldine Horan. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2018. 153-177.
---. “Anti-Immigration Rhetoric in Italy and in the USA: A Comparative Perspective.” Euro-American Relations in the Age of Globalization: Risks and Opportunities. Edited by Massimiliano Demata and Marco Mariano. Torino: Collane@unito.it, 2020. 97-121.
Malone, Barry. “Why Al Jazeera Will Not Say Mediterranean ‘Migrants’.” Al Jazeera 20 August 2015. http://www.aljazeera.com/blogs/editors-blog/2015/08/al-jazeera-mediterranean-migrants-150820082226309.html.
Mavroudi, Elizabeth and Caroline Nagel. Global Migration. Patterns, Processes, and Politics. London: Routledge, 2016.
Mouffe, Chantal. For a Left Populism. London: Verso, 2018.
Mudde, Cas. “Populism: An Ideational Approach.” The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Edited by Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, et al. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. 27-47.
---. The Far Right Today. London: Polity, 2019.
---. “The Populist Zeitgeist.” Government and Opposition 39.3 (2004): 541-563.
Mudde, Cas and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser. Populism. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.
Musolff, Andreas. “Dehumanizing Metaphors in UK Immigrant Debates in Press and Online Media.” Journal of Aggression and Conflict 3.1 (2015): 41-56.
Nielsen, Nikolaj. “Dozen Ministers Want EU to Finance Border Walls.” EUobserver 08 October 2021. https://euobserver.com/migration/153169.
OED. Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022.
Panizza, Francisco. “Introduction: Populism and the Mirror of Democracy.” Populism and The Mirror of Democracy. London: Verso, 2005. 1-31.
Partington, Alan. “Modern Diachronic Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (MD-CADS) on UK Newspapers: An Overview of the Project.” Corpora 5.2 (2010): 83-108.
---. The Linguistics of Political Argument: The Spin-Doctor and the Wolf-Pack at the White House. London: Routledge, 2003.
Piguet, Etienne, Pécoud Antoine and Paul de Guchteneire. “Migration and Climate Change: An Overview.” Refugee Survey Quarterly 33.3 (2011): 1-23.
Potter, Jennifer E. “Brown-Skinned Outlaws. An Ideographic Analysis of ‘Illegal(s)’.” Communication, Culture and Critique 7 (2014): 228-245.
Ritzer, George and Paul Dean. Globalization. A Basic Text. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2015.
Rothbart, Myron and Marjorie Taylor. “Category Labels and Social Reality. Do We View Social Categories as Natural Kinds?” Language, Interaction and Social Cognition. Edited by Gün R. Semin and Klaus Fiedler. London: SAGE, 1992. 11-36.
Rundell, Michael. “Searching for Extended Units of Meaning—and What to Do When You Find Them.” Lexicography 5.1 (2018): 5-21.
Sales, Rosemary. “The Deserving and the Undeserving? Refugees, Asylum Seekers, and Welfare in Britain.” Critical Social Policy 22.3 (2002): 456-478.
Sinclair, John. Corpus, Concordance, Collocation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.
Stavrakakis, Yannis and Giorgos Katsambekis. “Left-Wing Populism in the European Periphery: The Case of SYRIZA.” Journal of Political Ideologies 19.2 (2014):119-142.
Stubbs, Micheal. Words and Phrases. Corpus Studies of Lexical Semantics. London: Blackwell, 2001.
Taggart, Paul. Populism. Buckingham: Open University Press, 2000.
Taguieff, Pierre-André. The Force of Prejudice: On Racism and Its Doubles. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2001.
Taylor, Adam. “Is It Time to Ditch the Word ‘migrant’?” The Washington Post 24 August 2015. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/worldviews/wp/2015/08/24/is-it-time-to-ditch-the-word-migrant/.
UN DESA (United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs). International Migrant Stock 2020. New York: United Nations, 2021.
---. Recommendations on Statistics of International Migration. New York: United Nations, 1998.
https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/content/international-migrant-stock.
UNHCR (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees). 2021. Global Trends. Forced Displacement in 2020. Geneva: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, 2021. https://www.unhcr.org/statistics/unhcrstats/60b638e37/global-trends-forced-displacement-2020.html.
---. “Ukraine Refugee Situation.” 2022. https://data2.unhcr.org/en/situations/ukraine.
---. “UNHCR Viewpoint: ‘Refugee’ or ‘Migrant’ – Which is Right?” 2016. https://www.unhcr.org/en-us/news/latest/2016/7/55df0e556/unhcr-viewpoint-refugee-migrant-right.html.
van Dijk, Teun. “Critical Discourse Analysis.” The Handbook of Discourse Analysis. Edited by Deborah Tannen, Heidi E. Hamilton and Deborah Schiffrin. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell, 2015a. 349-371.
---. “Critical Discourse Studies: A Socio-Cognitive Approach.” Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. Edited by Ruth Wodak and Michael Meyer. London: SAGE, 2015b. 63-85.
---. “Discourse and Migration.” Qualitative Research in European Migration Studies. Edited by Ricard Zapata-Barrero and Evren Yalaz. Cham: Springer Open, 2018. 227-245.
---. “Discourse and Racism.” A Companion to Racial and Ethnic Studies. Edited by David Theo Goldberg and John Solomos. London: Blackwell, 2002. 145-159.
---. “Ideology and Discourse.” The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Edited by Michael Freeden, Lyman Tower Sargent and Marc Stears. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013. 175-196.
---. “New(s) Racism: A Discourse Analytical Approach.” Ethnic Minorities and the Media. Edited by Simon Cottle. Milton Keynes: Open University Press, 2000. 33-49.
---. “Political Discourse and Racism. Describing Others in Western Parliaments.” The Language and Politics of Exclusion. Others in Discourse. Edited by Stephen Harold Higgins. Thousand Oaks: SAGE, 1997. 31-64.
van Leeuwen, Theo. Discourse and Practice. New Tools for Critical Discourse Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.
van Leeuwen, Theo and Ruth Wodak. “Legitimizing Immigration Control: A Discourse-Historical Analysis.” Discourse Studies 1.1 (1999): 83-118.
Wodak, Ruth. “The Discourse-Historical Approach (DHA).” Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. Edited by Martin Reisigl and Ruth Wodak. London: SAGE, 2015a. 23-61.
---. The Politics of Fear. What Right-Wing Populist Discourses Mean. London: SAGE, 2015b.
Young, Jock. “Cannibalism and Bulimia: Patterns of Social Control in Late Modernity.” Theoretical Criminology 3.4 (1999): 387-407.
Zappettini, Franco. “The Brexit Referendum: How Trade and Immigration in the Discourses of the Official Campaigns Have Legitimised a Toxic (Inter)national Logic.” Critical Discourse Studies 16.4 (2019): 403-419.
Websites
Corbyn Jeremy Twitter Profile. https://twitter.com/jeremycorbyn.
European Parliament Website. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/portal/en.
Farage Nigel Twitter Profile. https://twitter.com/nigel_farage.
Labour Party Website. https://labour.org.uk/.
Palazzo Chigi Youtube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCp8W1bzofvzB8MfZSkYW2xw.
Partito Democratico Youtube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQg8BpZl15IUiKGmGPGPdLQ.
Reform UK Website. https://www.reformparty.uk/.
Renzi Matteo Facebook Profile. https://www.facebook.com/matteorenziufficiale.
Salvini Matteo Facebook Profile. https://www.facebook.com/salviniofficial/.
Salvini Matteo Twitter Profile.
https://twitter.com/matteosalvinimi/.
Sketch Engine. http://www.sketchengine.eu
UKIP Website. https://www.ukip.org/.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Maria Ivana Lorenzetti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Iperstoria is an Open Access journal.- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 BY-NC License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of their work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. We require authors to inform us of any instances of re-publication.
