Resilient Women and the ‘She-Cession’
Gender Equality Discourse in the EU
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13136/2281-4582/2026.i27.1643Keywords:
Policy discourse, Critical Discourse Studies, Gender mainstreaming, Women’s labour, RRFAbstract
This article discusses gender mainstreaming – the institutionalization of a gender equality dimension in policy-making – in recent EU policy discourse, focusing on Ursula von der Leyen’s first mandate as President of the European Commission (2019-2024) and the consequences of the coronavirus pandemic on women and labour. The pandemic-induced recession, which has been termed the ‘she-cession’ due to the widening gender gap in the paid workforce, put women in a “disproportionately” vulnerable position, also in terms of access to the economy. In this context, the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) and the National Recovery and Resilience Plans (NRRPs) – the overarching EU funding mechanism and the specific plans developed by each member state to use RRF funds effectively – have represented a unique opportunity to channel extraordinary resources towards redressive measures identifying women as the main beneficiaries, fighting economic abuse and promoting equal treatment. Building on Ursula von der Leyen’s pledge to make gender equality a key priority in her agenda, the article presents a corpus-assisted discourse analysis of a collection of interrelated EU political, institutional and legal documents that address gender equality and gender-sensitive recovery measures. The aim is to offer a critical discursive perspective on how the EU is struggling to effectively incorporate gender mainstreaming to improve the rights that are central to its democratic functioning.
References
Abels, Gabriele and Joyce M. Mushaben. “Great Expectations, Structural Limitations: Ursula von der Leyen and the Commission’s New Equality Agenda.” Journal of Common Market Studies 58.S1 (2020): 121-132.
Baker, Paul. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum, 2006.
Barker, Kim and Olga Jurasz. “Online Violence against Women as an Obstacle to Gender Equality: A Critical View from Europe.” European Equality Law Review 1 (2020): 47-60.
Bluedorn, John, et al. “Gender and Employment in the COVID-19 Recession: Cross-Country Evidence on ‘She-Cessions.’” Labour Economics 81 (2023): 1-10.
Bonini, Emanuele. “The Woman? Must Stay at Home. Here Is the 21st Century EU as Told by Eurobarometer.” Eunews 17 December 2024. https://www.eunews.it/en/2024/12/17/the-woman-must-stay-at-home-here-is-the-21st-century-eu-as-told-by-eurobarometer. All websites last visited 31/03/2025.
Burni, Aline. “Women in the European Parliament: Signs of Gender Equality Regression.” ODI Global 21 November 2024. https://odi.org/en/insights/women-in-the-european-parliament-signs-of-gender-equality-regression.
Carpentier, Nico and Jeffrey Wimmer. “Democracy.” Democracy and Media in Europe: A Discursive-Material Approach. Abingdon: Routledge, 2025. 5-43.
Catalano, Theresa and Linda R. Waugh. Critical Discourse Analysis, Critical Discourse Studies and Beyond. Cham: Springer Nature, 2020.
Council of Europe. Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence Against Women and Domestic Violence. CETS No. 210, 11 May 2011, Istanbul.
Debusscher, Petra. “The EU Gender Equality Strategy 2020-2025: The Beginning of a New Season?” Social Policy in the European Union: State of Play 2022: Policymaking in a Permacrisis. Edited by Bart Vanhercke, Sebastiano Sabato and Slavina Spasova. Brussels: ETUI, 2023. 91-110.
Donà, Alessia. “Gender Equality in the Italian Recovery and Resilience Plan: The Depoliticizing Effects of the Technocratic Draghi Government.” Contemporary Italian Politics 14.4 (2022): 458-471.
Elomäki, Anna. “The Economic Case for Gender Equality in the European Union: Selling Gender Equality to Decision-Makers and Neoliberalism to Women’s Organizations.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 22.3 (2015): 288-302.
Elomäki, Anna and Johanna Kantola. “How the European Parliament Worked Gender Equality into the EU Pandemic Response.” The Loop: ECPR’s Political Science Blog 8 March 2021. https://theloop.ecpr.eu/how-the-european-parliament-worked-gender-equality-into-the-eu-pandemic-response.
Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
---. The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting to Women’s New Roles. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2009.
European Commission. European Pillar of Social Rights. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2017.
European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE). “Economic Hardship and Gender.” n.d. https://eige.europa.eu/newsroom/covid-19/economic-hardship-and-gender.
---. Gender Equality Index 2024 – Sustaining Momentum on a Fragile Path. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2024.
European Parliament. Backlash in Gender Equality and Women’s and Girls’ Rights in the EU. Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs, 2018. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/supporting-analyses.
Eurostat. Gender Pay Gap Statistics. European Commission 7 March 2025. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Gender_pay_gap_statistics.
Garro, Maria, et al. “Violence against Men and Its Effects within the Workplace: A Literature Review.” Social Sciences 13.12 (2024): 636.
Goldin, Claudia. Career & Family: Women’s Century-Long Journey toward Equity. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2021.
Guerrina, Roberta, Heather MacRae and Annick Masselot. “Between a Rock and a Hard Place: The EU’s Gender Regime in Times of Crisis.” Women’s Studies International Forum 99 (2023): 102722.
Gwiazda, Anna and Lora Minkova. “Gendered Advocacy Coalitions and the Istanbul Convention: A Comparative Analysis of Bulgaria and Poland.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 26.1 (2024): 31-53.
Hakim, Catherine. Work-Lifestyle Choices in the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Hart, Christopher and Piotr Cap, edited by. Contemporary Critical Discourse Studies. London: Continuum, 2014.
Heritage, Frazer and Charlotte Taylor, edited by. Analysing Representation: A Corpus and Discourse Textbook. Abingdon: Routledge, 2024.
Johnson, Laura, et al. “Examining the Impact of Economic Abuse on Survivors of Intimate Partner Violence: A Scoping Review.” BMC Public Health 22 (2022): 1014.
Leahy, Mary and James Doughney. “Women, Work and Preference Formation: A Critique of Catherine Hakim’s Preference Theory.” Journal of Business Systems, Governance & Ethics 1.1 (2006): 37-48.
Lexical Computing CZ s.r.o. Sketch Engine. 2021. https://www.sketchengine.eu.
Lombardo, Emanuela and Petra Meier. “Framing Gender Equality in the European Union Political Discourse.” Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society 15.1 (2008): 101-129.
Lombardo, Emanuela, Petra Meier and Mieke Verloo. The Discursive Politics of Gender Equality: Stretching, Bending and Policymaking. Abingdon: Routledge, 2009.
McRae, Susan. “Constraints and Choices in Mothers’ Employment Careers: A consideration of Hakim’s Preference Theory.” The British Journal of Sociology 54.3 (2003): 317-338.
Mergaert, Lut and Rachel Minto. European Policy Analysis: Gender Mainstreaming in the European Commission. Sieps ─ Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies, May 2021. https://www.sieps.se/globalassets/publikationer/2021/2021_8epa.pdf.
Partington, Alan, Alison Duguid and Charlotte Taylor. Patterns and Meanings in Discourse: Theory and Practice in Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies (CADS). Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2013.
Rossilli, Mariagrazia. “Arginare il backlash.” inGenere 21 May 2024. https://www.ingenere.it/articoli/arginare-il-backlash.
Russo, Deborah. “Gender Equality in the Context of Recovery Plans after the Covid-19 Pandemic.” QIL, Zoom-in 87 (2021): 29-50.
Savski, Kristof. “Policy-Making: Documents and Laws.” The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics. Edited by Ruth Wodak and Bernhard Forchtner. Abingdon: Routledge, 2018. 355-367.
Ska, Marie-Hélène. “Far Right Against Women Workers’ Rights in Europe.” Social Europe 8 March 2024. https://www.socialeurope.eu/far-right-against-women-workers-rights-in-europe.
Sommers, Christina Hoff. Freedom Feminism: Its Surprising History and Why It Matters Today. Washington, DC: AEI Press, 2013.
Stratigaki, Maria. “Gender Mainstreaming vs Positive Action: An Ongoing Conflict in EU Gender Equality Policy.” European Journal of Women’s Studies 12.2 (2005): 165-186.
Taylor, Charlotte and Anna Marchi, edited by. Corpus Approaches to Discourse: A Critical Review. Abingdon: Routledge, 2018.
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Consolidated Version. Official Journal of the European Union, C 326, 26 October 2012: 47-390.
van Dijk, Teun A. Discourse and Context: Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London: Longman, 1981.
van Leeuwen, Theo. “The Representation of Social Actors.” Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis. Edited by Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard and Malcolm Coulthard. London: Routledge, 1996. 32-70.
Verloo, Mieke. “Mainstreaming Gender Equality in Europe: A Critical Frame Analysis Approach.” The Greek Review of Social Research 117 (2005): 11-34.
Vyas, Neha. “‘Gender Inequality ‒ Now Available on Digital Platform’: An Interplay between Gender Equality and the Gig Economy in the European Union.” European Labour Law Journal 12.1 (2021): 37-51.
Warburton, Emma and Georgia Raniolo. “Domestic Abuse during COVID-19: What about the Boys?” Psychiatry Research 291.6 (2020): 113155.
Wodak, Ruth. “Discourse and European Integration.” KFG Working Paper Series, No. 86, May 2018. Kolleg-Forschergruppe (KFG) “The Transformative Power of Europe.” Freie Universität Berlin. https://www.polsoz.fu-berlin.de/en/v/transformeurope/publications/
working_paper/wp/wp86/index.html.
Wodak, Ruth and Michael Meyer. Methods of Critical Discourse Studies. London: Sage, 2015.
Woodward, Alison. “Travels, Triangles and Transformations: Implications for New Agendas in Gender Equality Policy.” Tijdschrift voor Genderstudies 18.1 (2015): 5-18.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maria Cristina Paganoni
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Iperstoria is an Open Access journal.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 BY License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of their work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal. We kindly ask authors to inform us of any instances of re-publication.
