The Representation of Female Pain in Medical Academic Discourse
The Case of Vulvar Pain and Vulvodynia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.13136/2281-4582/2026.i27.1728Parole chiave:
CADS, Equality discourse, Gender medicine, Medical Academic Discourse, VulvodyniaAbstract
Health care professionals within the scientific community have long ignored or minimized vulvar pain, a condition estimated to affect one in ten people with a vulva. In recent years, this issue has received increased attention and is currently undergoing a process of pathologization, i.e., it is being officially recognized as a disease by medical institutions. The term “vulvodynia” has been introduced to label and confer pathological status to this chronic pain condition, although adequate categorization is still lacking.
Drawing on theories of the collective understanding of illness, which view discursive constructions as tools for shaping societal perceptions of legitimacy and credibility in relation to health conditions, this paper argues that the invisibilization of vulvar pain and vulvodynia stems from the broader issue of devaluing women and their experiences.
This study investigates the linguistic and discursive resources employed within scientific discourse to construct, frame, and (de)legitimize vulvodynia and vulvodynia patients in scholarly literature. A corpus-assisted approach is adopted to explore the evolving representations of vulvar pain and vulvodynia in medical discourse. An ad hoc dataset of scientific articles published in English over the past 25 years has been compiled and analyzed both qualitatively and quantitatively, aiming to contribute to a deeper understanding of how language shapes the reality of invisible pathologies and may ultimately lead to discriminatory practices.
Riferimenti bibliografici
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed., text rev.; DSM–5–TR). Washington DC: American Psychiatric Publishing, 2022.
Annandale, Ellen. The Sociology of Health and Medicine: A Critical Introduction. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2014.
Arslanian-Engoren, Cynthia. “Gender and Bias in Triage Decisions.” Journal of Emergency Nursing 26 (2000): 117-124.
Berger, Peter L. and Thomas Luckmann. The Social Construction of Reality. A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Doubleday & Co., Inc, 1966.
Bissell, Peter, Kath Ryan and Charles Morecroft. “Narratives about Illness and Medication: A Neglected Theme/New Methodology within Pharmacy Practice Research. Part I: Conceptual Framework.” Pharmacy World & Science 28.2 (2006): 54-60.
Bonfanti, Nicole, et al. Vulvas at Play: Co-constructing Knowledge and Awareness about Pelvic-vulvar Pain. Torino: Collane Unito, 2025.
Bornstein, Jacob, et al. “2015 ISSVD, ISSWSH and IPPS Consensus Terminology and Classification of Persistent Vulvar Pain and Vulvodynia.” Obstetrics & Gynecology 127 (2016): 745-751.
Brezina, Vaclav. Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A Practical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.
Bury, Mike. “Illness Narratives: Fact or Fiction?” Sociology of Health & Illness 23.3 (2001): 263-285.
Conrad, Peter and Deborah Potter. “From Hyperactive Children to ADHD Adults: Observations on the Expansion of Medical Categories.” Social Problems 47.4 (2000): 559-582.
Conrad, Peter and John W. Schneider. Deviance and Medicalization: From Badness to Sickness. St. Louis: Mosby, 1980.
Fairclough, Norman. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman, 1995.
Farrell, Janine and Thea Cacchioni. “The Medicalization of Women's Sexual Pain.” The Journal of Sex Research 49.4 (2012): 328-336.
Folkmarson Käll, Lisa, edited by. Dimensions of Pain: Humanities and Social Science Perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge, 2013.
Frank, Arthur W. “The Rhetoric of Self Change: Illness Experience as Narrative.” Sociological Quarterly 34.1 (1993): 39-52.
Freund, Peter E. S., Meredith B. McGuire and Linda S. Podhurst. Health, Illness, and the Social Body: A Critical Sociology. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2003.
Gillings, Mathew, Gerlinde Mautner and Paul Baker. Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2023.
Granello, Darcy H. and Todd A. Gibbs. “The Power of Language and Labels: ‘The Mentally Ill’ Versus ‘Person with Mental Illness.’” Journal of Counseling and Development 94.1 (2016): 31-40.
Grutman, Aurora J., et al. “Understanding Patient Experiences of Vulvodynia Through Reddit: Qualitative Analysis.” JMIR Infodemiology (2025): 5:e63072.
Hammarström, Anne, et al. “Developing a Tool for Increasing the Awareness about Gendered and Intersectional Processes in the Clinical Assessment of Patients – A Study of Pain Rehabilitation.” PLoS ONE 11.4 (2016): e0152735.
Hoffmann, Dianne E. and Anita J. Tarzian “The Girl Who Cried Pain: A Bias against Women in the Treatment of Pain.” Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 28.4 (2001): 13-27.
Jaworska, Sylvia and Kath Ryan. “Gender and the Language of Pain in Chronic and Terminal Illness: A Corpus-based Discourse Analysis of Patients’ Narratives.” Social Science & Medicine 215 (2018): 107-114.
Katz, James D., Rachel Seaman and Shari Diamond. “Exposing Gender Bias in Medical Taxonomy: Toward Embracing a Gender Difference without Disenfranchising Women.” Women’s Health Issues 18.3 (2008): 151-154.
Lorber, Judith and Lisa J. Moore. Gender and the Social Construction of Illness. Lanham: Bloomsbury Publishing PLC, 2002.
Kilgarriff, Adam, et al. “The Sketch Engine: Ten Years On.” Lexicography 1 (2014): 7-36.
McEnery, Tony and Andrew Hardie. Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Myers, Greg. “Narratives of Science and Nature in Popularizing Molecular Genetics.” Advances in Written Text Analysis. Edited by Malcolm Coulthard. London: Taylor Francis, 1994. 253-272.
---. Writing Biology: Texts in the Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press, 1990.
Riboni, Giorgia and Angela Zottola. “‘[T]heir pain felt like pins and needles.’ Expressing Pain through Metaphors.” [Conference presentation]. CERLIS Conference, University of Bergamo, Italy, 12-14 June, 2025.
Rickman, Sam. “Evaluating Gender Bias in Large Language Models in Long-term Care.” BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 25.1 (2025): 274.
Riska, Elianne. “Gender and Medicalization and Biomedicalization Theories.” Biomedicalization: Technoscience, Health, and Illness in the U.S. Edited by Adele E. Clarke, et al. New York: Duke University Press, 2010. 147-170.
Samulowitz, Anke, et al. “‘Brave Men’ and ‘Emotional Women:’ A Theory-Guided Literature Review on Gender Bias in Health Care and Gendered Norms towards Patients with Chronic Pain.” Pain Research and Management 2018.1 (2018): 1-14.
Sirohi, Diksha, et al. “Patient Experiences of Being Advised by a Healthcare Professional to Get Pregnant to Manage or Treat Endometriosis: A Cross-sectional Study. BMC Women’s Health 23.638 (2023): 1-10.
Tasca, Cecilia, et al. “Women and Hysteria in the History of Mental Health.” Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health 8 (2012): 110-119.
Werner, Anne, Liv W. Isaksen and Kirsti Malterud, “‘I Am Not the Kind of Woman Who Complains of Everything’: Illness Stories on Self and Shame in Women with Chronic Pain.” Social Science & Medicine 59.5 (2004): 1035-1045.
Werner, Anne and Kirsti Malterud. “It Is Hard Work Behaving as A Credible Patient: Encounters between Women with Chronic Pain and Their Doctors.” Social Science & Medicine 57.8 (2003): 1409-1419.
Young, Alyson L. and Andrew D. Miller. “‘This Girl Is on Fire’: Sensemaking in an Online Health Community for Vulvodynia.” CHI ‘19: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2019): 1-13.
Dowloads
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Copyright (c) 2026 Giorgia Riboni, Angela Zottola
Questo volume è pubblicato con la licenza Creative Commons Attribuzione 4.0 Internazionale.
Iperstoria è una rivista accademica ad accesso libero.
a. Gli autori e le autrici detengono il copyright e danno alla rivista il diritto per la prima pubblicazione con il contributo sotto licenza Creative Commons BY (4.0) che permette di condividere l’articolo con il riconoscimento della prima pubblicazione su questa rivista.
b. Gli autori e le autrici possono inoltre stabilire ulteriori direttive contrattuali per la distribuzione non esclusiva della versione del contributo pubblicata sulla rivista (es. ripubblicarlo in archivi istituzionali o in un volume), con uno specifico riconoscimento della prima pubblicazione su questa rivista. Chiediamo pertanto agli autori e autrici di contattarci nel caso di eventuali ripubblicazioni.
